Edited for my views on this ;D
Originally Posted by Dolentrean
Overall +2Candidate 1 -
-Oldbie - Good thing, as Bahamut said that is something we are lacking +1
-Well known and respected I think respect goes along way but old members should matter as much as they know the drill and should know the rules by now. 0
-Not much interaction with the newer members, I think we have that covered anyways with most of our staff but it is the new people that need the most dealing with...or so I think >.> -.5
-Posts mainly in GC and Feedback, this isn’t really a bad thing, but as we already have these areas covered very well with our staff this isn’t necessary. 0
-Has a smart unique personality and outlook that not many others have, this is a very big plus for obvious reasons +1.5
- Form activity currently moderate, This isn’t a bad thing, he is still active. 0
Overall +2Candidate 2 -
- joined within the last year and is a highly active poster, this could show someone who is going to get burnt out and leave the site in the near future but he has been here for what I am gonna say is 10 months and would have burnt out months ago. He might eventually not post as much but that just eventually happens to a lot of people. I think he will remain active. +0.5
-Well received and like by most of the newer members, but some of the oldbies will probably claim they've never heard of this person. This is something that isn’t really a bad thing, it just isn’t a good thing, again, we have most of the new members covered. 0
- Active everywhere, mainly GC. I think this is a good quality, anyone who is in all the forums is a plus, GC is the area with the most spam and need for modding. +1
- Friendly poster is a plus, but tendency to Spam and be Immature. Spamming isn't a bad thing. Only in excess is it a bad thing. The forum typically goes through times of spam and stuff and other times there is more of a crack down. The immaturity is what gets the minus but that just comes with time and responsiblity. -.5
-Activity level: very high. This is a good thing, activity is good. +1
Overall +2.5Candidate 3 -
-Has been an active member for three years. This is a good thing, he isn’t a newbie, maybe not an oldbie but not a newbie, also if he has been active for three years then he probably wont vanish on us. +1
-Posts a lot in the gaming forums, but not as much in GC. This I find as a plus, I think that while we do have a good cross section of the site covered with our current staff the Gaming Forums is where, we as a staff are slightly lacking, so some more activity there could be a plus. +1
-Is well known and well respected in the gaming forums for their helpfulness and advice. There is that key word respect again. There may be a small chance that they could be less helpful in the gaming forum once they become a CK, but maybe not. +0.5
- Calm, hardly ever participates in forum 'events'. This isn’t a good thing, but it isn’t really a bad thing, not much else to say. 0
-Forum activity level is very high in the Gaming forums. I award zero for this point because it is just the same thing as point number 2. "Posts a lot in the gaming forums, but not as much in GC. " Yeah...we know he is active in the gaming forums and not in the generals already. This is just redundant. +0
Overall +2.5Candidate 5 -
-Joined two years ago, has become an active member. +1
-Posts interactive threads and event ideas. He obviously is trying to keep activity high and make the forum fun for everyone, I think this has staff written all over it. +1.5
-Well liked by the community for their upbeat personality. While not the same as being respected being liked is still a plus, just not as much. +0.5
-Shies away from confrontation. This isn’t a bad thing at all. Not every staff member needs to be able to go in and deal with big conflicts. I think we have a good representation of ass kicking ability 0
-Sometimes is inactive, vanishes for periods of time and doesn’t post much. Bad thing, not a very bad thing as they always come back, but not a good thing. -0.5
