we have it stated in here. Lord knows they've read this and are reading it. They know our debate, and they know what we think.
We support candidate 1, and if we were staff, we'd wait and see on candidate 3 and 5.
THE JACKEL
we have it stated in here. Lord knows they've read this and are reading it. They know our debate, and they know what we think.
We support candidate 1, and if we were staff, we'd wait and see on candidate 3 and 5.
THE JACKEL
add me, PSN: ljkkjlcm9
Basically, now just to see if any more of our team shows up to throw in new ideas and such.Originally Posted by ljkkjlcm9
I like the idea of keeping tabs on 3 and 5 for possible knighting in the future. However if we get six votes in the next hour for a second candidate, we will let them pass through, otherwise we keep them recommended, agreed? I vote 3.
Sorry qwert I can't agree with that. That would do a majority rule, and I believe to say, "We want _______ as a Cid's Knight" I really think we need unanimous.
Well I brought that up because Bahamut and Dolentrean won't be back until after the deadline, and IBPengwynZ has been pretty inactive. If you don't agree though we can strike the motion.
Sorry for the general lack of being here...
Anyway, what you all have worked out sounds perfect to be. Also, I don't think it needs to be stated that we are keeping tabs on 3 and 5. This is about who we're promoting, so if they aren't being promoted why mention it?
Boy am I an unfunny ass.
I think they should be mentioned because, many of us are very to saying they should be Knighted, we just can't come to an unanimous vote that we would make them CK's
Whether or not it should be mentioned, it already has been lol
THE JACKEL
add me, PSN: ljkkjlcm9
I'm sorry I have been so inactive today, but school and school activities has kept me away.
Anyways, while number 1 was not one of my top choices, I could certainly agree to knight said member. And I especially like that we are keeping the thought of 3 and 5 as possible future knights.
EDIT: Wait, can somebody give me an overview of how we as a staff look in strengths and weaknesses?
Last edited by Pant Leg Eater from the Bad World; 04-08-2008 at 12:54 AM.
<PaperStar> live fast, die young, bad plefs do it well
I'll make the official response then, If you have time, feel free to add to the reasoning.
We, team awesome has decided to promote candidate one to the rank of Cid's Knight. We chose 1 because we feel that the originality would be a god thing, and candidate one fills in any gaps that our group would miss.
But what exactly are those gaps?
EDIT: I am still going to go along with this choice. I trust you guys to have made a wise decision, and I would want us to be a solid team. I would just like a clear view of what you guys came up with.
<PaperStar> live fast, die young, bad plefs do it well
The main gap is the connection with oldbies.
All right. I can understand that.
Thank you qwerty.
<PaperStar> live fast, die young, bad plefs do it well
qwerty forgot we thought his unique view and smart personality would be a plus to our team.
Yeah, I'll add that to the official post. Eating dinner at the same time.
We, team awesome has decided to promote candidate one to the rank of Cid's Knight. We chose 1 because we feel that the originality would be a good thing, and candidate one fills in any gaps that our group would miss. We like his unique view, and think his/her personality would be a great addition to our moderating team.
Posting Permissions
