Which of the current presidential candidates do you support?

[Aerith's Knight]

I'll dumb it down for you for things in the future..

If i was talking about you, i wouldve used either your name or a quote.

glad this misunerstanding is solved.

[KentaRawr!]

I don't care if you were talking about me or not. You basically said that those whom support a presidential candidate are blindly following them, and are fools. Look at your post, and look at where it is, and tell me if you can tell how it's insulting.

[Roto13]

A man who blindly follows a wise man is still a fool.

Showing agreement is not blind following.

I did not speak about anyone in particular(as i dont know what you are talking about).. but as they say, retorting is sign of a guilty concience.

Here that peoples? If AK says something you think is stupid and you reply to it, it's because he's right.

Good to know.

[Heath]

In before RON PAUL WILL END THE NEW WORLD ORDER

Ron Paul might be standing as a Libretarian though! So as a third party candidate he can ROCK THE VOTE and be completed overshadowed by John McCain winning.

If I had a vote, I'd probably give it to Clinton. I'm not a fan of Obama because I'm not really convinced that he has much substance behind his inspiring persona. He strikes me as somewhat like David Cameron in that he's very good at inspiring hope in people, but I'm unsure whether or not he can actually deliver. I like the fact that he - personally - is trying to run a clean campaign even if those around him (e.g. Samantha Powers) aren't being the most tactful. I don't like how Clinton's run her campaign, but I don't mind her on the whole. Not really a supporter, but she's the best on offer. I don't think Clinton or Obama would beat McCain in all honesty.

Those that want to be in a posi<b></b>tion of power automatically are the least qualified to do so.

Yeah, because everyone who wanted to be a leader was less qualified than their peers. And that is to say that people who did not want to be in power were automatically more apt when thrust forth? I'll remember to tell Taft that, because he would ohh so definitely agree with you. Ohh, hi, Teddy. Hi, FDR. Hi, Churchill*. Make sure you say hello to Jackson and Grant while they are burning in hell.

Don't you just love sweeping overgeneralizations? I sure do!

Yeah I know he's British. He's also your mother and therefore, awesome.

Well, his mother was American.

Also, I agree with Miriel's post. It'd be nice if people took more balanced views on the candidate and it does annoy me when people discount a certain party or candidate without giving any rational reasoning behind the assertion. While I would prefer Clinton, I do see that Obama has a lot of strengths and think he's a generally nice chap, but I'm just not wholly convinced.

[Vivisteiner]

ROFLMAO!

Epic win!





Obama all the way!

[Aerith's Knight]

A man who blindly follows a wise man is still a fool.

Showing agreement is not blind following.

I did not speak about anyone in particular(as i dont know what you are talking about).. but as they say, retorting is sign of a guilty concience.

Here that peoples? If AK says something you think is stupid and you reply to it, it's because he's right.

Good to know.

And again, you misunderstand the point(but seeing your record, thats not a big suprise)..

I say something general, Kentarou takes it personal, i have no idea what he is talking about, and all we are arguing about is whether or not i was talking to him.. as i am myself, i should know whether or not i am talking about someone..

but as you obviously know what i mean better then myself, enlighten us Roto about your deduction that im right if someone thinks what i say is stupid..

because what i actually said wasnt even the point.. but as usual, the point matters little to you doesnt it? As long as you get to bash me.

I don't care if you were talking about me or not. You basically said that those whom support a presidential candidate are blindly following them, and are fools. Look at your post, and look at where it is, and tell me if you can tell how it's insulting.

If someone follows another without actually knowing and agreeing what they stand for(that is what blindly means imo), then yes, they would be fools. But it was you who took that personally, i still have no idea why.

[Marshall Banana]

I want to vote for Obama's pastor; he's hilarious.

[Tavrobel]

I want to vote for Obama's pastor; he's hilarious.

I approve of this statement.

[Roto13]

A man who blindly follows a wise man is still a fool.

Showing agreement is not blind following.

I did not speak about anyone in particular(as i dont know what you are talking about).. but as they say, retorting is sign of a guilty concience.

Here that peoples? If AK says something you think is stupid and you reply to it, it's because he's right.

Good to know.

And again, you misunderstand the point(but seeing your record, thats not a big suprise)..

I say something general, Kentarou takes it personal, i have no idea what he is talking about, and all we are arguing about is whether or not i was talking to him.. as i am myself, i should know whether or not i am talking about someone..

but as you obviously know what i mean better then myself, enlighten us Roto about your deduction that im right if someone thinks what i say is stupid..

because what i actually said wasnt even the point.. but as usual, the point matters little to you doesnt it? As long as you get to bash me.

You accused Kentarou of being guilty of whatever it is you're bitching about because he actually responded to you. Sounds like I got it right the first time.

[KentaRawr!]

AK, I've described to you quite clearly what I found insulting. You showed no specification as to whom you were speaking to, and thus, I looked at your post as an ignorant and unwarranted statement against showing support for a presidential candidate.

[Vivisteiner]

I want to vote for Obama's pastor; he's hilarious.

I approve of this statement.

Thats a given.


Either him or Barillary Clibama.

[Aerith's Knight]

What a bunch of morons you are.. I accuse no one, I talk to no one, make one general speculation..

so if you dont agree with that, or take it personal..

I dont give a , it says more about you then me..

If you have a problem with it, go beg mullet, foa or leeza to delete it, if they are willing to do that on unfounded speculation.

[Raebus]

Oh I'm sure they're willing to delete it. They might not appreciate you calling people "morons" though.

[Flying Mullet]

Holy crap, can we have one semi-serious thread outside of EoEO that doesn't turn into a pseudo-flame-fest?

I know people are purposely pushing buttons while still staying within the rules and it's getting tiring. Seriously folks, knock it off.

[Psychotic]

Anyone but Obama. Preferably McCain. Why? I want to see the population of the internet whine and cry like they did when Bush won. Their reactions if their precious little Obama lost would be priceless.

Of course, he won't, but y'know. They're all the same anyway.