I am just gonna vote an inactive then...
##vote: scrambled egg
When you post I will take it off
I am just gonna vote an inactive then...
##vote: scrambled egg
When you post I will take it off
I'm seriously getting this much crap for sticking my "how the hell do we start day one?"
Isn't that the question thats asked, like, every game? Your saying, you'd all be happier with me if I spammed 4 posts, then voted later on to get my fifth when someone else stuck their head out?
To get something accomplished, don't we need to have someone go, "Okay, lets start, how do we want to do that?"
You aren't getting crap for that, you're just getting crap, really...
We gotta give crap to someone for something.
Edit: And I'd hardly call "What do we do?" contributing.
We could mention the whole "Why should the cop roleclaim" thing as contributing, but really that was obvious enough that there was no need to bring it up.
In day 1, we often just vote around until we find a pattern and we find a person who just screws up. That hasn't really happened yet. I like to vote for an inactive to get them goin, but that isnt needed as much now with ed's new rule.
@Sausage: It got us all speaking didn't it? Getting us on topic is contributing. I'm just annoyed that I might be a scapegoat again.
The only person it got speaking was me, accusing you day 1.
So yes, you did accomplish something. ^_^
Everyone else talking really didn't connect to you.
Anyway, I should be on for another two hours, but I should submit a vote. Just in case I forget or get distracted or something.
Anyway, I feel Ed's rule makes voting for complete inactive unnecassary, but I think we should still vote for people who are posting just enough to possibly get by. Leaving me a slightly smaller list to chose from.
With that, its pretty natural to me, that a mafian would banwagon on me, to try and make everyone else give up on voting anyone else. So, that lowers my suspects even more. Now, Yogurt, Sausage and Bacon are posting plenty, and aren't in the banwagon votes that I consider bad. Pancakes has barely posted (so naturally I want him to post more), and submitted a 'deathblow' banwagon, that pushes me into the "gonna be dead may as well vote for him" catagory that the mafia would want, making me think he's most likely to be a mafian out of everyone who voted me.
## Vote: Pancakes
I would like to get everyone who signed up playing, and voting for them does work.
Votecount:
Donuts (4) Sausage,Yogurt, Bacon, Pancakes, Yogurt
Bagel (1) Muffin
Captain Crunch (1) Waffles
French Toast (1) Cinnamon Toast
Pancakes (1) Donuts
Scrambled Eggs (1) Captain Crunch
Bacon (0)Yogurt
Not Voting (4) Bagel, French Toast, Pop Tart, Scrambled Eggs
I don't think French Toast is going to post, so:
##Unvote:French Toast
and
##Vote:Sausage
What if we are all town and this is just a messed up social experiment from edczxcvbnm?
I think the vote inactives argument is weak, that's all.
Last edited by [M] Dee; 05-22-2008 at 02:43 AM.