Final Fantasy VI...

[bipper]

Kenshin IV, you have a lot to learn about debating and the matters of subjective vs objective facts, and subjective vs collective opinions.

The game is perfect.

The game is perfect.

These two sentences look the same, but surrounded by context, or directed with a hint of poise and rational, they could be read completely different. With out this rational, one could assume they are asserting that six was indeed, perfect. In fact, it was not perfect, if you consider bugs and other anomalies. With your rational, it should be apparent that a fan boy fell in love with VI due to, dare I say it?, personal tastes.

Sure it is annoying when a fan boy gets all uppity, however, I would take a fan boy over a heartless dispassionate world any day. Passion, opinion, and hypocrisy are some of the greatest qualities of man kind. Arrogance and pride are two of the worst. Unfortunately, they do not mix well in the cocktail that is man.

Graphically, a 2-d game can be better than a 3-d game. This all comes down to the metric in which you used to gauge graphics.

Same with story.

Same with music.

etc... etc... etc...

I am a fan of both games, and they are both my favorites. Though, 6, in my opinion, satisfies me in a hole different way than seven -- I tend to like six more.

There has been a few loopholes in the logic people are using, as in saying that 2d is better than 3d, and then saying that there are too man characters, and this is just too much to be right. Using your prior, I would figure than more was better. Using the latter, it seems that a conservative approach to features is more in taste. Therefore, I would have to suggest that the collective logic used is based on subjectivity. You know, subjectivity. The reason they can make different final fantasies with out having to remake the same system and make it better only.


That, or you are actually flame trolling r0to, which is just hilariously abnormal.