Nobody has defended the Star Wars prequels or Superman Returns yet so I guess I won the agrument with those films.
Nobody has defended the Star Wars prequels or Superman Returns yet so I guess I won the agrument with those films.
Superman Returns sucked but I don't see how you can say the Star Wars prequels had paper thin plots. Poor acting and over reliance on CG, sure, but the plot threads between all three films were pretty good with sufficient depth, considering the scope of the Star Wars universe.Originally Posted by John_912
The plots were paper thin because they weren't very epic, the original trilogy was more epic than the prequel trilogy.
Also I consider the plots in Tim Burton's Batman to be really paper thin because those films are showing their age there's not a lot going on in Batman 89 like there was in TDK.
The creation of the Clone Army, destruction of the Jedi Order, and usurping of power in the Republic by Palpatine isn't epic?
Poor acting and direction may have made the movies seem lame but I don't understand how you can feel the story wasn't epic.
Basically.
Althought "Wanted!"'s story just killed the movie for me xD
Well, first of all I hope that you don't mean that a film has a paper-thin plot if one of its subplots doesn't get enough development. Spider-Man's plot is more complex than just the Peter & MJ drama (which was also nice in the way it was shown in the film, particularly the touching finale). After all, you have Peter's character development in quite many ways (with all the tragic circumstances as well as finding out what it takes to be a hero), and you have Norman Osborn's stuff, Harry, and various other things going on. Sure, Spider-Man isn't the most complex film out there, but I don't think that it has a paper-thin plot.
Well, the Star Wars prequels aren't thin on plot. There's quite a bit going on in the films even if it's sometimes presented in a jumbled way. Even if the plot could've worked out better on screen, it still has quite a few things going on in it. After all, Anakin's character arc (as well as his relationships with various people), Palpatine's gradual rise to power and the Sith manipulation of events as well as the conflict itself are just some of the many plots that take place in the prequels.
As for Superman Returns, although its plot isn't the most complex one out there, it does offer many character arcs in it, and I like how Superman gets some development and how the plot does offer subtle nuances that make it richer. There are quite a few things going on in the film, although the most important thing is obviously the issues between Lois Lane and Superman as well as the "savior" parallels.
Similarly Tim Burton's Batman films aren't really paper-thin as far as plot is concerned. Sure, some of the things they present might be straightforward, but there's so much going on in both films (particularly in Batman Returns) that I can't really see the plots being paper-thin. Others have already pointed out some things that show that Burton's films aren't "thin" at least as far as plot is concerned.
How I met your mother, Donald Duck's parents style! Love at first temper tantrum!
Facebook | Last.fm | LiveJournal | MyAnimeList | tGAWiki
I'm not really a big fan of any of the six Star Wars movies but Ill agree with Hsu that what made the prequels extra bad was the dull dialogue. You really couldn't care about any of the characters when they were given such lifeless personalities.
Because there's no epic scenes with the three primary characters. (Anakin, Obi-Wan and Padme.) The special effect scenes were great but they didn't have any memorable dialogue and they reused dialogue from the original trilogy instead of creating new dialogue.
That's my problem with the prequel trilogy the dialogue...the bad acting can be over looked if the script is well written.
Depends on the movie
It depends on my mood, sometimes if I just want to sit back and relax, a simple movie with virtually little plot can be enough for me. Heck, I watched Charlies Angels about three times this week, for that reason. xD
I didn't say I like movies <i>because</i> of thin plots, nor did I say I like <i>all</i> thin movie plots by default. All I'm saying is that it's possible for a movie to have a story that lacks complexity, while still being a good film. They're not mutually exclusive, that's all.So I take it you didn't have a problem with Spider-Man 1? Because that film kind of had a paper thin plot. Peter and MJ's relationship wasn't very deep and meaningful in my opinion I think it was about as deep and meaningful as Bruce and Vicki's relationship in the 1989 Batman film...which wasn't very deep and meaningful at all.
The only thing Burton ever did right was The Nightmare Before Christmas.
And even that ended up being ruined by the emogoth circle of cancer.
I like Kung-Fu.
And oddly, he didn't even direct that one - the characters and ideas were his, but not the movie itself.
We have Disney to thank for that
You hold my heart in your manly hands I wanna feel the throb of your handsome gland. I wanna hold you tight like a newborn kitten, against my flesh like a cashmere mitten. Tickly tick, I'm makin' skin bump heaven and all the way down it's lookin' cleanly shaven. Prickety pricks, it's stubble on stubble I better slow down or I'm in real trouble. Want you, touch you, feel you, taste you! Knick knack whacky whack 'till I see the man stew. spin you around let me see that hole! I'm a tunnelin' in a like a short hair mole. Once I'm inside I'm gonna leave a trace, half in there and half on that face! One finger, two finger, there fingers gone! Mano a mano I love you John!
That's not an argument it's a statement, and it's wrong.
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
