Nothing at all? You spent what a few seconds looking at it? I know you did cause you were talking to me on MSN, obviously distracted from reading the thread.

But the thing is, I only found things that would help people not look like scum, which wasn't what I was looking for but anyway, after re-re-skimming, I've found something that stands out to me.

AK said that " Mistakes are not something you can afford in a 9-player game. " Something like this would tell me that you either were someone who would hold your vote for later, or someone who would be terribly against voting for an inactive on Day 1/2.

And then you said,
Just like you said. In a 24-player game, it can work out to play inactive. But in a game like this, people will notice, like I did, and therefore will get votes for the first day.

If you don't help us, you help them. And by being inactive, you're not helping us.
But really, you're helping nobody when you vote for an inactive rather than someone who is actually scummy. Am I right?

I can't really think of anyone else and if Sagensyg is replaced when inactive, the vote comes with nearly no thinking.
I looked at the list and thought, if I had to give a vote without reasoning within this game, who would I pick. Your name came up, I'm afraid.
That's pretty risky tactics when you said earlier that you can't afford to make mistakes in a small game.


That's just what I came up with. I don't know who to vote for at the moment, but I think AK is behaving supsiciously.