Quote Originally Posted by Sagensyg View Post
Just like you said. In a 24-player game, it can work out to play inactive. But in a game like this, people will notice, like I did, and therefore will get votes for the first day.

If you don't help us, you help them. And by being inactive, you're not helping us.
But really, you're helping nobody when you vote for an inactive rather than someone who is actually scummy. Am I right?
You are forgetting this is day 1. There isn't any basis, any reason at all for voting on day 1, at least in the beginning, because nobody has said much yet, no vote counts to look at, no nothing.

So what do you do? Go for inactive.

I can't really think of anyone else and if Sagensyg is replaced when inactive, the vote comes with nearly no thinking.
I looked at the list and thought, if I had to give a vote without reasoning within this game, who would I pick. Your name came up, I'm afraid.
That's pretty risky tactics when you said earlier that you can't afford to make mistakes in a small game.
Well, it was 28 hours into the first day, and the only inactive(you) became active. So I have 8 equilly scummy people, where one of them has a reputation of ruining games. What would you do?

Not voting is not an option.

That's just what I came up with. I don't know who to vote for at the moment, but I think AK is behaving supsiciously
In such reasoning I can just as well say: Hmmm, you and Demon Dude are in a standoff, and now you both vote against me. How strange.

You can make everything seems scummy if you put enough effort and quotes into it.

To put it simply, I won't change my vote. I have no other suspisions and to vote you out of pure scorn would be very sad.