Mafia F11! Game Over - Del Murdered - Town Wins

[Aerith's Knight]

A TO THE K

You can make everything seems scummy if you put enough effort and quotes into it.

LOOK I'M MAKING YOU SCUMMY! That or I'm just presenting a case against a suspicious character.

:rolleyes2

You are forgetting this is day 1. There isn't any basis, any reason at all for voting on day 1, at least in the beginning, because nobody has said much yet, no vote counts to look at, no nothing.

So what do you do? Go for inactive.

This is in reference to Saggy. You say this, there is no basis for voting and well right before this you voted DD

Saggy was the last inactive, and after he became active, I turned to the one person I would vote for without reason(it was day 1 after all). I said all this a few posts before that, mind you.

[quote]

##vote: Demon Dude

I'm sorry to say though that this is because of previous games, because every time you disrupt the game.. as a townie.

I looked at the list and thought, if I had to give a vote without reasoning within this game, who would I pick. Your name came up, I'm afraid.

It's still a reason. "I don't like how you play you must be scum" is what I get from that. You're so adamant on voting for inactives because it's a reason. And baseless votes are bad right?

Voting for inactives on day 1 is a good strategy, and I stand by that. Baseless votes are bad, I agree, but.. well.. I didn't have anyone else to vote for. xD

Plus, there were a lot of inconsistencies in his posts.

Well, it was 28 hours into the first day, and the only inactive(you) became active. So I have 8 equilly scummy people, where one of them has a reputation of ruining games. What would you do?

Not voting is not an option.

You spelled equally wrong and it's bugging me xD ANYWHO Even though DD has a reputation of ruining games, he really can't do much in such a small game with only so many roles. That's like, "I'm gonna claim this mouse ate the cheese even though it's stuck in a cage."

Well, if DD claims cop or doctor to get out of a lynch(while being townie, mind you) and the real doc or cop has to reveal himself to lynch DD(thinking only a mafia would lie), I say he can ruin a game.

And don't say he wouldn't do that.

It seems that you two were had argumentative banter yesterday and it was "I'll vote you" "well I'll vote you!" Then come today and you state

It's good for you I don't do personal grudges.

Can you blame me?

And if I wasn't for giving you another chance, I wouldve voted for you. Which I haven't, if you didn't notice.

"Oh I don't hold grudges but oh wait, you suck at all the past games Oh yeah I'm not gonna vote you now because you no longer deserve it."

You know, this passive agressiveness is really starting to bother me.

DD seemed to make an effort, even Psy noticed, so I thought I'd give him a break. Plus, it was day 2 and there were bigger fish anyway.

I dunno to me it seems like you're just trying to play the nice guy now. you give everyone chances though they all deserve clean slates according to AK. Like in reference to levy

Why is waiting for someone's defence bad play? Seems like playing well to me. Or should I change my vote 12 times a day? :rolleyes2

[quote]

However, I want to give him an honest chance. So I won't vote until I hear his defence.

You point out reasons why levy is suspicious but then you don't vote even though earlier you went on about how not voting is bad. Yet, why no vote?

Because we had 28 more hours of development. No need to rush. Changing votes do not give confidence.

Just like you said. In a 24-player game, it can work out to play inactive. But in a game like this, people will notice, like I did, and therefore will get votes for the first day.

If you don't help us, you help them. And by being inactive, you're not helping us.

I hate this logic. It's ridiculous. I hate inactive hunting, at least in the beginning. People never really knew for sure when this game was gonna start. Some are busy with lives. And yes such a small game it CAN hurt people but it also could potentially get rid of a power role, a role that is so sparse in these games. So sure you could have got yourself a mafia, but percentage wise you could have had 7/9 chances to get a town. In some of those cases there was 2/7 chance to get a power role, or 1/7 so 2/9 or 1/9 power roles for town. That's just as lucky as 2/9 for mafia. You were taking the same chance for a power role as you were for mafia. HOW DOES THIS MAKE SENSE?

Everyone confirmed, so there are no inactives, just lurkers.

Voting is a way of bringing them out to post.

I pointed out a few things that threw red flags for me. SOOOOO


##Vote: Aerith's Knight

I could grudge-vote you know, but I dont suspect you, so I won't.

I do feel the same way about you as paul does, though.