Quote Originally Posted by ShunNakamura View Post
Quote Originally Posted by I'm my own MILF View Post
You're also wrong. It's pretty clear throughout the creative industries and arts that there is a distinction between quality and enjoyment.

No, I am fairly certian I am right.

What are games played for? For most people games are played for entertainment. Thus, as far as that individual is concerned a game that fails to entertain isn't a good game. For another person that same game may entertain making it, at least from their persepctive, a good game.

Once again once you start breaking a game down into its core components and began discussing the quality of the games components then you run into stuff that can be more than subjective.
Yeah which is obviously what I was saying: A game which has high quality across most or all of its core components is a good game, whether you like it or not. The reserve is also possible. I love EDF 2017, but it's a pretty dire game. Dynasty Warriors is average, but again, I love playing them. Zelda is fantastically accomplished in pretty much every way - and bores the hell out of me. You couldn't pay me to play Zelda games anymore. Fallout is, objectively, an amazingly good game. It does essentially everything right. If it isn't to someone's taste, that doesn't make the game bad, it makes the game not to their taste.