Originally Posted by
[M] Calculon
I don't like Farnsworth's vote for Nixon.
##Vote: Professor Farnsworth
o.O
I know, voting in Mafia is crazy!
Originally Posted by
[M] Calculon
Originally Posted by
[M] Horrible Gelatinous Blob
Why vote for Farnsworth? He's been active, Nixon has yet to post!
Why vote for Nixon? He hasn't even posted yet.
I don't think going after an inactive so early is a good idea. It's only day 1 after all.
Vote someone who voted but not those who don't show up. Yeah you're right it was the first day. Also on the first day people make joke votes or random votes. Didn't mean you had to hop on Farnsworth.
So, it makes more sense to pick on someone who is defenceless. Yeah, not buying that.
Originally Posted by
[M] Calculon
I have to say welcome to Mr.Devil, good to see you active. I would say that if you actually posted anything useful instead of chatting with Santa. Not a scummy move, just kinda useless.
Obviously you're one of those people who is straight to the action. You realize people slip up when they exchange banter right?
You realize that witty banter distracts the town from finding the mafia right? Also Dosn't even belong in an attack post. This piece is all filler
Originally Posted by
[M] Calculon
I think it would be a good idea to look at the votes from day 1, and question the people who voted over and over until we create some nice day 2 discussion. That gives us
Blob, Calculon, Fry, Nixon.
I'll ask a simple question to all of you out there. If you had to vote for any of these four people in a tiebreaker, who would you vote for any why?
I'd vote you Honeybuns
You were the one who tossed a senseless vote on a random/joke vote starting a bandwagon.
Does a raindrop know it could be the first in a storm. Again, faulty logic
Originally Posted by
[M] Calculon
myself, I would have to cast a vote for Fry. He quickly followed up on my vote for Farnsworth, which was accompanied with the reason
Originally Posted by
Me
I don't like Farnsworth's vote for Nixon.
I'll admit that it was a pretty bad reason, but it was a pretty senseless vote after all. Unfortunately in making this vote a bandwagon started ending in the death of the crazy good professor. Fry is in the middle of said bandwagon, right after I made the vote.
This would be my current choice, but it's not final as of now. i would love to read your opinions, they set my circuits full of robotic love
Egads, you realized what I just pointed out! That doesn't quite matter... you still did it. It's like taking candy from a baby, it cries and you say you're sorry but you still keep it. Sure Fry jumped up to join you but you still gave him a reason too. You can't say he's at fault when you're the root.
Why are you so defenseive over a guy who posted once. Oh, I know, because you are doing something similar. You wait for someone else to have a vote on them, then attack. I'll name that tactic sharking for future use.
Originally Posted by
[M] Calculon
ummm, I try and stir up discussion, so I must be scum.
First I'll adress Mom. She says I voted the professor off. Umm, I had the first vote on him, and the second in the day.
Next I'll address the conclusion that since I find Fry the most suspicious of the voters, I'm giving him the blame of day 1. I'm not. I'm saying that there was about next to no amounts of activity by anybody during day 1, so it is next to impossible to get a definate conclusion based on posts that don't exist. Based on the limited evidence, I find that Fry is the one who has the highest chance of being possible scum, at about 43%.
Urm... now you're eliminating someone somewhere. How is it that the other voters of the day that were your first basis of scummy are now gone and fry takes up half the blame. Sorry that doesn't sit well either.
Where did Calculon say he was ignoring Nixon and Blob?
Finally I'll say clear the misunderstanding of trying to share the blame. That out of 6 votes total an innocent person died? Here is shifting the blame. All people who did not vote are at fault. If they had been more active, then we may have gotten a scum instead of a townie. Thats also a pretty silly conclusion, which is why I feel it is faulty logic.
The reasoning behind bringing up 4 people including myself is that it would be pretty strange for the mafia to not vote at all, so I am inclined to belive that a mafia member was among those who voted during day 1. So the question is still open, and feel free to drill me with questions, I'm fully charged and can go all day.
That sounds pretty sound. Wait, isn't it ok to be inactive this time or well at least not vote? If you look in the past games, you'd get in trouble if you didn't vote or weren't active in anyway. We use to be able to look and see who wasn't replaced when they were inactive and claim scum. Now well you can be inactive and be fine.
I digress, activity or not, you can't judge it on this round if it's a scummy trait or not.
Defending the inactives again. Yeah, you sure can't vote when all the inactives get a death threat. So adamant about defending them, trying to drag people down when you fall?
Originally Posted by
[M] Calculon
Mom, I would also appreciate it if you look the extra moment to type correctly, as it hurts my eyes to read it otherwise.
Yeah thanks for being asses. "You can't type it's annoying" Sorry but it wasn't that bad. Not everyone has perfect grammar.
Useless filler again
But from what I see you think that I am scummy for "lumping all voters together." I have simply stated that we should look at all 4 people who have voted day 1 as a start for discussion. And what we have now is discussion.
I never said anything like we should only kill people from those 4.
No what you said was out of these people, 1/4 is most likely scum so let's go for them. Let's see that quote, cue the quote now,
The reasoning behind bringing up 4 people including myself is that it would be pretty strange for the mafia to not vote at all, so I am inclined to belive
that a mafia member was among those who voted during day 1.
So yeah you kinda said we should kill from those four cause there is a scum in it...
##Vote: Calculon
He said look at those four, and question them. You Vote before he can answer, not a town friendly thing to do especially when half the town is inactive as well and near the end of the day when most people are asleep!!!!!
I don't have a lot of time. I'm still busy with finals so I need to get this vote out now when I have a little bit of spare time. If you're not scum, my bad. But what you've said, of the little evidence we have, you seem the scummiest in my eyes.
Oh hi sympathy card again.