No one has talked about Bender for a while, so let's do him.
I noticed some things on Bender when I was doing my catch up yesterday but I forgot most of it.And I'm not about to go sift through 400 posts again to try and remember it. Maybe later depending on time and circumstances.
Mom was kind enough to summarize Bender's earlier posts here.
I'll just reiterate the argument she already provided. That being Bender has been popping in at convienent times (during activity of others) to make a couple general statements and then leave. No real discussion taking place.
Let's move on to votes. Bender voted for Zapp, twice, in the last two days. No other votes on the other days. Though I applaud his effort to try and bring out the inactives, Zapp was a very safe person to have a vote on since he doesn't say much and no one else even mentions him. Avoids the big discussion of the day but still stays 'active'.
Yes, I do realize my vote is currently on Zapp. Once again I can't fault the idea behind it. However, a campaign to get inactives up and about needs to come with some level of grandstanding, which I hope I have been accomplishing here. One vote for an inactive under the radar does nothing, and that's what Bender has been doing.
I'm tempted to switch my vote to call Bender out now since I think he's the most likely to be lurking this thread, but something is telling me that would not be the right move. I guess I'll leave it as Zapp and see where it goes. Plenty of day left.
More people post!



And I'm not about to go sift through 400 posts again to try and remember it. Maybe later depending on time and circumstances.
