[QUOTE=Super Sepiroth;2625510
a) If he were a God he could not be defeated because if he can do anything he could kill Cloud with not much effort, and if he knows everything, he'll know Cloud's moves and stop them happening.
[/QUOTE]

All the Norse gods ended up dying. And they were gods. Numerous other Mythologies talk about gods being killed. In fact most other gods from mythologies aren't omniscient and still called gods.

b) He can't be everywhere because he has a physical body and presence. We can all see him.
Jesus was a god and he had a physical being. In fact most deities from mythology have physical forms and are gods. Physical bodies and seeing them has nothing to do with it.

Well according to my RE Class (about 3 or 4 years ago now) I had a brilliant teacher called Mr Travis, and he said a God has to be all these 3 things

Omnecient - Can do anything
Omnipotent - Knows everything
Omnipresent - Is everywhere
Simply sounds like the Judeo-Christian god to me and nothing more.

Which immediately makes it a false statement for the simple reason that I have stated previously in this thread, that basing an argument on a fictitious unknown existence which can not be observed, measured, or explained and claiming these traits, of something that's never been known to exist, are in fact the true traits that define it is ludicrous.

Also as a point of note, I too had a Philosophy teacher a while back who said (technically it was some Philosopher in the church whose name I forget, but the teacher was adamant on saying it was correct despite it's horrible flaw in logic) that a god would be a perfect being, and the traits of a perfect being would be all knowing, all loving, all powerful, and they would have to exists because a perfect being would be imperfect if they didn't exist.