Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 17

Thread: Does having "Final Fantasy" in the title make you a harsher critic?

  1. #1
    hhr1dluv's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Wuthering Heights
    Posts
    315

    Default Does having "Final Fantasy" in the title make you a harsher critic?

    I've seen this issue skirted in a number of topics, but I thought I'd ask it outright.

    I just a read a post my sdm in the Final Fantasy II forum where he says something along the lines of "FFII as an RPG is awesome, but as a Final Fantasy is just so-so." It got me to wondering, do you, as a fan of Final Fantasy, tend to be a harsher judge on a Final Fantasy game than you would be if it were just a regular game? Or, do you think you are more predisposed to like it because you want to like it? Are there any Final Fantasy games that you think would have utterly failed if they weren't called FF? Are there any that you think might have been rated and received a bit better if they weren't FFs and thus held to a certain industry standard?

    For me, I would say that I'm probably in the minority in that I can honestly say that I feel predisposed to like a game just because it's called an FF game. I like this series, I like Square Enix. The games make me happy, and to be honest, I don't really want to dislike their games and lose faith in them. So, maybe sometimes I play dumb or lower my standards/expectations a tiny bit so that I can be very happy with the final project. It just makes me happier to be happy with SE than to spend time finding faults in their games, and to worry myself wondering if they're capable of producing games that move me anymore.
    I, II, III, IV, V, VI, VII, VII: DoC, VII: CC, VIII, X, X-2, XII, KH, KH:CoM, Re:CoM, KHII, CT

  2. #2
    Memento Mori Site Contributor Wolf Kanno's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    Nowhere and Everywhere
    Posts
    19,738
    Articles
    60
    Blog Entries
    28
    Contributions
    • Former Cid's Knight

    Default

    I'll take the bait.

    Yes, I do feel having FF in the title makes me judge it harsher. I experienced the series during a time when it was constantly redefining the genre and I do feel that time has set a standard I generally expect from the series. Course, I'm harsher to numbered games than the others. Though, I am a bit of a realist, who can see that Crystal Chronicles is not exactly going to be the same as FFIX. Thus it does become a bit more of a game by game scenario.

    I judge the sequels harshly but a) its cause I feel they are abominations, and b) I feel they have to work in the confines of the original scenario and somehow expand it on the same level the game originally evoked. Obviously, I feel one group is doing a better job than the other but let's face it, the Ivalice team kinda cheats as its source material isn't confined to specific characters and places.

  3. #3
    VICIOUS GEEK SOOT~ヽ(`Д´)ノ scrumpleberry's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    in my scrumplybee tree~
    Posts
    5,482

    Default

    Yes, as it should.

  4. #4
    Gold is the new black Goldenboko's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    16,136
    Articles
    39
    Blog Entries
    1
    Contributions
    • Former Editor
    • Hosted the Ciddies

    Default

    Yes and no. Having Final Fantasy in the title, does give me a bottom line expectation. I know what company I'm buying from, so if the game isn't at least decent I know they're just milking the title. But other then that, a game that's "Good" doesn't suddenly become "Okay" if it has Final Fantasy attached to it. Now if we're talking about in comparison things can change. I think FFVII is a good game, but in comparison to the rest of the Final Fantasies it's only okay. But that's different and is a concept that kind of speaks for itself.

  5. #5
    i am electro boy .:kerrod:.'s Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    The Merry Old Land of Oz...tralia...
    Posts
    597

    Default

    i think it's the complete opposite for me when i pick up a 'Final Fantasy' game i immediately go 'oooh, this is gonna be great!' and, consequently, overlook some of the smaller inconsistencies or bad features it's very stupid of me to do that, but that's just the way i think

  6. #6
    Depression Moon's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Warrior Falls
    Posts
    6,050
    Articles
    45
    Blog Entries
    2
    Contributions
    • Former Editor

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Goldenboko View Post
    Yes and no. Having Final Fantasy in the title, does give me a bottom line expectation. I know what company I'm buying from, so if the game isn't at least decent I know they're just milking the title. But other then that, a game that's "Good" doesn't suddenly become "Okay" if it has Final Fantasy attached to it. Now if we're talking about in comparison things can change. I think FFVII is a good game, but in comparison to the rest of the Final Fantasies it's only okay. But that's different and is a concept that kind of speaks for itself.

  7. #7
    hhr1dluv's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Wuthering Heights
    Posts
    315

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Wolf Kanno
    I'll take the bait.
    Bait?
    I, II, III, IV, V, VI, VII, VII: DoC, VII: CC, VIII, X, X-2, XII, KH, KH:CoM, Re:CoM, KHII, CT

  8. #8
    Do Myself a Mischief Vermachtnis's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2003
    Location
    That Weird Building
    Posts
    7,209

    FFXIV Character

    Ekhi Ysengrim (Brynhildr)

    Default

    Nope. I take every game as it's own entry. That goes for every series and genre. I take everything from a brand new perspective. I can never under stand the "It's a good game, but as a part of this series, it is terrible!" argument. Sounds kinda snobbish to me :rolleyes2

  9. #9
    Light Hero Saber's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    1,204
    Blog Entries
    4

    Default cheers peers

    I tend to like the game when it has Final Fantasy in the title but that changed with the gamecube spin off crystal something. I remember going to game stop and buying everything with final fantasy in it, even if I didn't own the system it was for.
    Marcus
    "No cloud, no squall shall hinder us!" - FF9

    Games completed - 1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10, 10-2, 12, 13, 13-2, 13-3 Tactics, Tactics Advanced, Crisis Core, Dirge of Cerberus, KH, KH2, And played 11.

  10. #10
    card mod ur face Rocket Edge's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    On the Emerald Isle
    Posts
    6,507
    Articles
    1

    FFXIV Character

    Novi Glitzko (Sargatanas)

    Default

    To me, definitely. But it's only natural for something you hold in high regard to have ditto expectations.

    Str8 Pimpin'

  11. #11
    Recognized Member Jessweeee♪'s Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    i'm on a sandbar help
    Posts
    19,882
    Blog Entries
    12

    FFXIV Character

    Sarangerel Qha (Twintania)
    Contributions
    • Former Cid's Knight
    • Former Site Staff

    Default

    Naw, it just makes it easier for me to ignore whatever flaws it might have. Some people think that's dumb of me, but at least I enjoy the game more, right :</>D?

  12. #12
    Slothstronaut Recognized Member Slothy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    I'm in space
    Posts
    13,565
    Blog Entries
    27
    Contributions
    • Former Cid's Knight

    Default

    Not really. I do expect a new FF to re-define the genre in some way (preferably for the better) but I typically want that from any game I play. If it doesn't offer anything new and interesting then it damn well better excel at the same-old, same-old.

  13. #13

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by hhr1dluv View Post
    I just a read a post my sdm in the Final Fantasy II forum where he says something along the lines of "FFII as an RPG is awesome, but as a Final Fantasy is just so-so."
    I should have worded that better. I meant to say in comparison, not that it makes much of a difference. Final Fantasy II hardly plays like Final Fantasy, in comparison to the rest. For the same reason I don't care for Final Fantasy XII.

    So yea, I guess you can say I'm biased on a game with Final Fantasy slapped on the title.

  14. #14
    Eggstreme Wheelie Recognized Member Jiro's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Posts
    26,942
    Articles
    65
    Blog Entries
    1
    Contributions
    • Former Cid's Knight
    • Former Editor
    • Notable contributions to former community wiki

    Default

    It's not so much "Final Fantasy", but "Square-Enix" that affects my opinion. If it's made by Squenix, I'll give it a shot and probably overlook a lot of the minor faults. That being said, if the game is horrible I will not play it anymore, so it doesn't have too much power over my opinion of the game.

    They see me rolling. They hating, patrolling.
    Trying to catch me riding dirty.


  15. #15

    Default

    I dunno. On the one hand if FF X and FF XII didn't have 'Final Fantasy' in the title I would never have bought them awful games. But on the other hand I do expect every FF to be as good as VI and VII which sadly is impossible.

    So it's yes and no from me. It DOES make me a harsher critic on the poor FF's, but I'm more likely to give the bad games a chance than other RPG's. I guess I think "this game MUST be good. It's a Final Fantasy! Must just be me, I'll give it another chance.... Nope it really is this terrible."

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •