I can see what you both mean. I personally think the only way we'll know for sure is if Square actually says they leave subtle hints - or they don't. For now it's up to debate and everyone has an opinion including me, but I accept I may be wrong (Note: I say "may be" because I still hang on to a minor hope that I am right - not because I am arrogant, because I am not). (To Wolf Kanno only: I never really concidered VII's ending to be a "clifhanger" - more evidence on how two people can see the same thing differently)
I think the main reason I like to assume Square (and indead other makers) are like this is because this what I would do if I made (for example) an RPG. Of course, I would have the main stuff obvious, but I would provide "hints" as well.
Funnily enough, it never really occured to me that many of VII's monsters where the same albeit a different colour scheme. Despite the fact many NPCs looked identical - I always asumed that the mosters where all "related" - like how you can have many breads of the same animal, and it was all deliberate move to have them look similar, but looking back - it probably was Square reusing sprites.Originally Posted by Lacarus
However it's funny the Tiamat stuff was mentioned in a thread in which I admited to having theories...![]()




Reply With Quote