That is precisely what I thought and it is why I asked you. For me, it is the final nail in FDR's coffin.
Looking over the thread, two things jumped out at me. Firstly, when Jefferson said he was sure Clinton was innocent, Teddy, Senior and FDR all jumped on him demanding how he knew. Link to FDR's post. All of this is extremely suspicious. You all obviously thought he was hinting at trying to be the cop, and then tried to draw it out of him. Why? If someone has just dropped a hint, why on earth is it a good idea to pile on them to try to get them to full-blown claim?
Secondly, http://forums.eyesonff.com/2650446-post468.html I consider this post to be the most suspicious in the entire thread. Classic mafia tactic. Pretending to contribute by making a nice little color coded guide...and not giving any thoughts on it of his own. Smoke and noise.
##vote1: FDR
As for my second vote, I believe Reagan and Clinton to be town, so they are out. John Adam's claim was a bit of a dangerous move, but I am more than willing to give him the benefit of the doubt.
I was thinking of checking out Andrew Jackson because I don't like this "make of it what you will" catchphrase and its implications, but damn, Senior just got pretty defensive in that last post, seemingly out of nowhere. Relax! If you're town, you don't need to be so edgy.
Finally, just as a clarification, my partner made the statement that one of the two is a naive doctor. I disagreed - naive doctor is a pointless role from a balancing point of view, it achieves nothing, and I fail to see why it is even considered a possibility - and now I have convinced them otherwise, thus the apparent contradiction.




