DLC for PS3, BULL****!

[ljkkjlcm9]

I actually think the Wii has done alright this year. Tenchu, MadWorld, Little Kings Story and House of the Dead all this year. I'm probably going to buy one soon actually.

@ Dreddz: Yeah I'm looking for games that are actually good before declaring the Wii not .

Trauma Center, Castle of Shikigami III, and Milestone Ultimate Shooting Collection.

Muramasa: The Demon Blade
The Conduit
Arc Rise Fantasia
Monster Hunter 3
Tales of Graces
Dragon Quest X
FF:CC Crystal Bearers
No More Heroes: Desperate Struggle
Sin and Punishment 2
Valhalla Knights: Eldar Saga
Wii Sports Resort

and those are just to add to your list of announced games... Now not all I listed are due out this year, but a number of them are. On top of that we can expect
Star Fox
Kirby
F-zero
and another Mario and Zelda
before the Wii is done.

I love my Wii. I love playing my roommates 360, and I enjoy playing my friends PS3. I want all 3 eventually. They all have something to offer, why can't everyone just admit it?!?!?!

THE JACKEL

[Iceglow]

As for the comment on Games > DLC I would rather have 5 decent DLC packs out in 6 months than 10 crapily made games in 6 months, that said I do not imply the PS3 does not and has not had some decent games released this year or at any other year for that matter.

Well yeah you blatantly do imply that otherwise you wouldn't make the comment in the first place. If the PS3 does actually get decent games then the statement you made is completely pointless.

@ Dreddz: Yeah I'm looking for games that are actually good before declaring the Wii not .

Actually Milf, I think there has been some definite good releases on the PS3 it is just with the most part the "exclusive" content released on PS3 in terms of new games has generated only a couple of good hits and the rest are future releases or past ones going platinum. Platinum re-release doesn't count. Killzone 2 obviously is a great game however I would still in any straight 6 month period rather have 5 good DLC addons released instead of 10 badly made crap games. Imagine if Army Men or something equally dire came out with 3 or 4 games and microsoft announced a new addon of good quality I would rather have the addon than the games. Overall the PS3 is a very good console, Sony do need to finish setting the damn consoles hardware out properly and see to it that they do more to attract good DLC to the PSN, an announcement of a 160 gig console during the release day of your new 80 gig console is 1) a stupid idea which caused the 80 gig to tank and 2) signifies further unrest in the hardware of the ps3 unless they did a "ps3 elite" console similar to the xbox 360.

[Slothy]

Actually Milf, I think there has been some definite good releases on the PS3 it is just with the most part the "exclusive" content released on PS3 in terms of new games has generated only a couple of good hits and the rest are future releases or past ones going platinum.

What the hell are you talking about? If Killzone 2, Little Big Planet, Valkyria Chronicles, Resistance 1 & 2, Metal Gear Solid 4, Uncharted, Warhawk, Ratchet & Clank, and Gran Turismo are your idea of only a couple of good (exclusive) hits then I'm surprised you'd defend the 360 at all. And someone needs to learn the definition of the word "couple".

And please stop complaining about the PS3 having multiple hardware versions. They've never had more than two in production at a given time. And if you want to talk about how many versions actually differed from one another other than in hard drive size, they've had five seperate models sold in North America. The 360 has had four. And if you want to get into complaining about hardware, buying a 360 is like playing russian roulette with the RRoD, and Microsoft also crippled their less expensive launch model by not including a hard drive so they could sell their overpriced proprietary HDD. They've each had their hardware faults, but who do you really think has the worse track record in that area?

[KentaRawr!]

Hey!

I like the Wii.

[Madame Adequate]

I said good, folks, not overhyped, overrated new versions of old games. Of the Wii games listed there are possibly three worth getting

[Shoeberto]

I said good, folks, not overhyped, overrated new versions of old games.

Just for the sake of argument, the same could be said of Halo (GAYLO) 3

[Momiji]

I said good, folks, not overhyped, overrated new versions of old games. Of the Wii games listed there are possibly three worth getting

Okay, okay, so half of the games I mentioned are arcade ports. That doesn't subtract from the fact that they're smurfing fantastic.

[Psychotic]

I said good, folks, not overhyped, overrated new versions of old games.

Just for the sake of argument, the same could be said of Halo (GAYLO) 3

One day, Hsu - and that day might not be for months, it might not even be for years, but that day will happen - one day, you will resign from staff. And on that day, I will remember this, and I will ban you all the way back to god damn Boise.

[Madame Adequate]

Seriously guys just listen to what Yahtzee says because he's not wrong:

The Escapist : Video Galleries : Zero Punctuation : MadWorld

[Lacarus]

Just because some of us own a PS3 doesn't mean we should be classified as lesser gamers who don't deserve DLC for our games!

Actually, the Gamer And Games Department of the UN puts every gamer in the World on a list corresponding to what system(s) they have and decides who gets DLC. PS3 owners are classified as lesser gamers or "less fortunate gamers" as they call and are among the lowest on the list, just below WII owners and thus gets nothing.

Sorry couldn't resist.

I was just wondering why you don't go and buy yourself a X360 and become a member of the Elite? If you don't want the same games for two systems, go to Gamestop and work something out. It's not like it's that expensive.

[Dignified Pauper]

I don't know why anyone didn't jump on the PS3 PSN game Fat Princess with me... Here... I'll post some screens:

NSF56K











If none of you think it looks impressive, you're all stupid.

[Bolivar]

GTA IV DLC cost Microsoft $50 million, Killzone 2 cost Sony $20 million. Strictly speaking as a gamer, which would you rather have your company spending money on?

Metal Gear Solid 4
Resistance 2
Motorstorm: Pacific Rift
Valkyria Chronicles
Little Big Planet

Killzone 2
inFamous?
God of War III
Uncharted 2
Heavy Rain
MAG
White Knight Chronicles

Even if inFamous ends up being crap, that's still 10 slamming titles in a span of less than 2 years. Why would I ever want to keep playing Fallout or Grand Theft Auto when newer, more innovative titles are coming out?

Even if you want to talk sequels Resistance 2 and Motorstorm: PR were praised across the board for doing everything right that the originals didn't, and then some. Ninja Gaiden 2, Gears of War 2, Halo 3 and Fable 2 were all universally critiqued for either being inferior or too similar to their predecessors. And those are their main exclusives.

Now don't get me wrong - there's so many great multiplatform games coming out on both consoles I would never argue that the 360 is a bad system. But I don't get how anyone who's really a gamer can go on a crusade saying they're doing something right, or sony's doing something wrong, when from a game's perspective Sony had a better year last year and they're doing it again in 2009. It's really sad to hear gamers sound like business students throwing financial statistics at you instead of discussing the actual software.

Also, Iceglow, I'm not sure what the hell you're talking about with the PSN not having a system comparable to microsoft's XBL points. The PSN has the "Wallet" where anyone can upload you money on your account to use, or you can buy those gift cards from stores with cash/whatever to get redeemable codes to use to buy games. At least in America, I guess you guys don't have it over there.

Also, you could never say XBL is more "stable" or even reliable than PSN, from what I hear XBL goes down alot more than I've ever heard the PSN go down, and MTV multiplayer conducted a test which concluded downloads are faster on the PSN.

I always say XBox Live is the gaming equivalent of iTunes, you could list all the convenient features you want, at the end of the day you're still paying for something most people get for free.

[Madame Adequate]

See, now, the PS3 isn't something I want enough to spend that much money on yet, but that's a list of games mostly worth having. Unlike a certain other console.

However, this line:

Ninja Gaiden 2, Gears of War 2, Halo 3 and Fable 2 were all universally critiqued for either being inferior or too similar to their predecessors.

Is complete bull, except perhaps for Ninja Gaiden 2 because I wasn't paying attention. The other three are widely regarded as being excellent sequels which built on previous strengths, reduced previous weaknesses, and were generally totally awesome.

[Momiji]

I don't know why anyone didn't jump on the PS3 PSN game Fat Princess with me... Here... I'll post some screens:

NSF56K











If none of you think it looks impressive, you're all stupid.

I remember making a thread on that a while back. I want to play it, but I don't have a PS3.

Really, the only things that attract me to the PS3 is Disgaea 3, Noby Noby Boy, and Fat Princess. However, that's not enough to make me go out and buy one.

[Bolivar]

See, now, the PS3 isn't something I want enough to spend that much money on yet, but that's a list of games mostly worth having. Unlike a certain other console.

However, this line:

Ninja Gaiden 2, Gears of War 2, Halo 3 and Fable 2 were all universally critiqued for either being inferior or too similar to their predecessors.

Is complete bull, except perhaps for Ninja Gaiden 2 because I wasn't paying attention. The other three are widely regarded as being excellent sequels which built on previous strengths, reduced previous weaknesses, and were generally totally awesome.

A simple search for the reviews or conversation with gamers will bring up other opinions.