Apparently you don't know what the words "universally" and "critiqued" mean. Some people have made those claims. Those people were wrong. If people don't like those games that's fine, that's their business, but their personal taste with regards the game overall doesn't change the objective facts that those games added to their predecessors. I'm not even going to start on the idea that there is something wrong with a sequel to a massively successful game being much akin to it. I'm just not.Originally Posted by Bolivar
A simple search for the reviews or conversation with gamers will bring up other opinions.See, now, the PS3 isn't something I want enough to spend that much money on yet, but that's a list of games mostly worth having. Unlike a certain other console.
However, this line:Is complete bull, except perhaps for Ninja Gaiden 2 because I wasn't paying attention. The other three are widely regarded as being excellent sequels which built on previous strengths, reduced previous weaknesses, and were generally totally awesome.
If you, or anyone else, can name me twelve non-remakes/non-Virtual Console games right now, that I want to play, that I can't get a superior version of on another console, I'll probably go out and buy one. Here, I'll even get you started:Oh come on, the Wii has way more than that. I'm the one who apparantly hates the Wii and even I can name at least a dozen titles for the Wii that are worth my money.I said good, folks, not overhyped, overrated new versions of old games. Of the Wii games listed there are possibly three worth getting
- Zack & Wiki.
- No More Heroes.
- Super Mario Galaxy.
Reply With Quote