Not going to fly for me, mate. A collection of subjective opinions, no matter how large or brimming with experience and education, says nothing about whether your subjective opinion will come to the same conclusion. Critics are about the least objective source of information imaginable; they make their living articulating their opinions, but their words are no more than that, and even a thousand critics may be "wrong" in your view, if you should happen to disagree with them. I grant you, if an artist is critically acclaimed by the most reputable, intelligent sources, your chances of coming across said artist's work and enjoying it are improved, but it is no guarantee. Credit is seldom placed precisely where it is due, after all; genius may be universally panned by critics out of sheer controversy, and mediocrity may be praised simply because it comes from a particular artist. It is not a perfect system, and though critics have much more objective knowledge of music theory than your average fan, the essence your argument eventually boils down to is: "other people like it, so it is good", and that is a principle with which I will disagree with a flagrancy you have never witnessed.Originally Posted by Wolf Kanno
If you already happen to agree with that sentiment, then sure. If the critics flock to something you truly loathe, their acclaim should not even make you flinch before you announce that you believe the music is awful.Originally Posted by Wolf Kanno
I do believe that most of the truly exceptional composers of our species eventually receive the recognition they deserve, but it is oftentimes hard-won, and slow in manifesting. In the meantime, the initial critics are pretty much obligated to call "genius" and "drudgery" on anything the least bit controversial in a dizzying, discordant flurry until the mainstream audience acquires the music and settles the matter somewhat with their sales and downloads. It seems likely (I don't know for certain) that Uematsu has quite a solid critical reception. Objectively, a critic could remark that a particular piece of his music is "intricate". The moment he says it is "beautiful", however, we enter subjective territory, and critics must necessarily describe the personal feelings evoked by an album, so that the audience has some idea of whether they are interested in the genre -- *breathes deeply* -- making critical acclaim valuable, but ultimately as open to interpretation as the music itself. One must hear the music and make up one's own mind, and whatever is determined thereby is the best measure of quality possible. Subjective? Of course. If music were not so, then Beethoven's "Moonlight Sonata" would be no more potent than a symphony of car horns on an urban street.
I knew that either you or our resident White Wizard would do the research and say something like this.Originally Posted by Wolf Kanno
![]()
I simply summoned the name of the most popular, godawful artist I could think of at the time who seemed likely to have released more music than Mitsuda, but admittedly I was uncertain whether it was actually the case . . .
By who? Her fans and mainstream critics undoubtedly discuss her work to no end, simply because the tart is good business. I hope you do not mean to suggest that the perceived caliber of the critic has some bearing on the music, though?Originally Posted by Wolf Kanno
Which is all fine and reasonable, but quite far removed from our biggest initial question of "who writes the best music". I have no doubt whatsoever that the opinions of some critics can be altered with currency (the music industry being the viciously polluted thing that it is), and anything passed down in wisdom from such potentially fickle hands must be taken with salt. It may be a contributor, but never a deciding factor.Originally Posted by Wolf Kanno
Not really, to my thinking. We are simply working with different variations of an exceedingly open-ended question. And to claim that only one possible interpretation of a question like this exists would be as ridiculous as . . .Originally Posted by Wolf Kanno
. . . as claiming that Uematsu is Mitsuda's equal.
So yeah; if you wish to consider it "your bad", please do so, but there is no harm done, and I certainly cannot say that you are "absolutely wrong".
Took me a while, but I do believe I comprehend the gist of your thinking now, Wolf.Originally Posted by Wolf Kanno
Must be quite a restless position.Originally Posted by Wolf Kanno
When two gods take up arms and unleash melodic wrath on one another, there is bound to be some splash-back on the spectators. *_*
I have yet to be convinced that objective points alone are capable of settling this issue to any kind of satisfactory degree. Seems like we have reached an impasse of stubbornness.Originally Posted by Wolf Kanno
And . . . there are also some significant precursors to Xenosaga I in the Xenogears OST, notably "Gathering Stars in the Night Sky", compared to the opening of "Warmth". Both terribly affectionate pieces; I like it.Originally Posted by Wolf Kanno
Never got that impression; no worries.Originally Posted by Wolf Kanno
To say the least of it. ^_^ I am assuming Mitsuda addiction is not out of the question, and if so, I am most likely afflicted.Originally Posted by Wolf Kanno
Cannot smoke this substance, though; this stuff must be injected directly into the cerebrum.
*Nod* I hear you. Did you ever end up casting a vote, by the way?Originally Posted by Wolf Kanno
Very cool. ^_^ I will make a point of listening to your suggested tracks in the near future. Operating on a dial-up connection here, and I do not quite have the needed time to load them all up (taking my elder brother out for a meal in honor of his second completed decade of existence, if the details are of merit). Soon, though, no doubt.Originally Posted by Wolf Kanno
You did not just debase "Auron's Theme", "Fight With Seymour", and "Servants of the Mountain".Originally Posted by Wolf Kanno
Originally Posted by The White Wizard
. . . You know what, see you both in Tartarus.





When two gods take up arms and unleash melodic wrath on one another, there is bound to be some splash-back on the spectators. *_*
Cannot smoke this substance, though; this stuff must be injected directly into the cerebrum. 

Reply With Quote