Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 43

Thread: Are we gonna have to pay to play this time??

  1. #1

    Chocobo Are we gonna have to pay to play this time??

    I just saw that there is already a FFXIV online comming out, are we going to have to pay to play this time??? That was pretty lame to do that on XI... Hopefully we wont have too

  2. #2

    Default

    It costs them money to maintain the bandwidth you need to play. So I imagine probably



  3. #3
    Recognized Member VeloZer0's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Posts
    3,984
    Contributions
    • Notable contributions to Final Fantasy forums

    Default

    And the most important part, having a steady stream of income to play development staff to develop new content for the game.

  4. #4
    trancekuja's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    The Elm Chanted Forest
    Posts
    638

    Default

    What? People pay for their games?

  5. #5

    Default

    I don't understand why people have so much trouble with this. Do the math sometime and you'll realize that paying to play an MMO is cheaper than almost anything else.

    You go to see Harry Potter this weekend with a drink and a popcorn, you've payed for a month of an MMO. How about dividing out the amount of time you invest into an offline game vs its cost.

    If you played FFXII for 300 hours and payed 50 bucks for it, then you're paying about 16 cents/hour.

    If you only played FFXI for 2.5 hours a day on average, that would be about the same cost.

    Most games you play, especially FPSs and platformers you may only get 10-20 hours out of. You're getting a hell of a lot less for your money any time you pick up the majority of single-player games.

    On top of that, you're getting new content with decent regularity.


    Not to be rude, but I figure this is more a complaint from younger people for two reasons.

    1 - It's easier to talk mommy and daddy into buying a game one time than paying a fee.

    2 - Young people aren't used to paying for things that have no solid real-world representation like car insurance, rent, etc. I sure wish I could pay my electric bill as a one time thing and not pay for it monthly.



    Like someone already mentioned, you're paying for continuing development of your game in addition to paying to keep the servers running 24/7.


  6. #6

    Default

    Originally posted by Yeargdribble
    I don't understand why people have so much trouble with this. Do the math sometime and you'll realize that paying to play an MMO is cheaper than almost anything else.

    You go to see Harry Potter this weekend with a drink and a popcorn, you've payed for a month of an MMO. How about dividing out the amount of time you invest into an offline game vs its cost.

    If you played FFXII for 300 hours and payed 50 bucks for it, then you're paying about 16 cents/hour.

    If you only played FFXI for 2.5 hours a day on average, that would be about the same cost.

    Most games you play, especially FPSs and platformers you may only get 10-20 hours out of. You're getting a hell of a lot less for your money any time you pick up the majority of single-player games.

    On top of that, you're getting new content with decent regularity.


    Not to be rude, but I figure this is more a complaint from younger people for two reasons.

    1 - It's easier to talk mommy and daddy into buying a game one time than paying a fee.

    2 - Young people aren't used to paying for things that have no solid real-world representation like car insurance, rent, etc. I sure wish I could pay my electric bill as a one time thing and not pay for it monthly.



    Like someone already mentioned, you're paying for continuing development of your game in addition to paying to keep the servers running 24/7.
    It isnt a complaint from younger people that dont have to pay for things because mommy n dddy pay it for them. I actually have to pay my own car insurance, had to save my own money to even buy my car, parents didnt pay a dime for it, and if I want to get something it has to come out of my own money aswell.

    Im just saying theres alot of great online games out there that you only have to pay for the game and never have to pay again, and the only thing you have to pay is for the expansions. Im sure Square makes enough money from all its customers and fans worldwide to be able to host the servers so we dont have to pay again. Id be happy to pay for upgrades on it like new expansions, but we shouldnt have to pay a monthly fee.

  7. #7
    Zachie Chan Recognized Member Ouch!'s Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2002
    Location
    Miami
    Posts
    7,652
    Articles
    3

    FFXIV Character

    Swygwyrd Eryistyrmstn (Sargatanas)
    Contributions
    • Hosted Screenname Competitions

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Chocobo King View Post
    Im just saying theres alot of great online games out there that you only have to pay for the game and never have to pay again, and the only thing you have to pay is for the expansions. Im sure Square makes enough money from all its customers and fans worldwide to be able to host the servers so we dont have to pay again. Id be happy to pay for upgrades on it like new expansions, but we shouldnt have to pay a monthly fee.
    Are you kidding me? The whole reason that Square ever pursued the online gaming market in the first place was because they were nearly bankrupt from their endeavors with the Spirits Within.

    As far as I'm concerned, it's absolutely ridiculous to expect Square to take a loss on FFXI just because they make money elsewhere. Think like a business-minded individual and try and justify that for me.

    Further, the problem with charging for expansions only is that expansions--usually--are released rather infrequently. I'd rather pay a monthly fee and get the version updates and regular tweeks and fixes in place of one expansion pack every year and a half to two years.

  8. #8

    Default

    Originally Posted by Ouch!
    Are you kidding me? The whole reason that Square ever pursued the online gaming market in the first place was because they were nearly bankrupt from their endeavors with the Spirits Within.

    As far as I'm concerned, it's absolutely ridiculous to expect Square to take a loss on FFXI just because they make money elsewhere. Think like a business-minded individual and try and justify that for me.

    Further, the problem with charging for expansions only is that expansions--usually--are released rather infrequently. I'd rather pay a monthly fee and get the version updates and regular tweeks and fixes in place of one expansion pack every year and a half to two years.
    Thats fine, but im not talking about XI, im talking about XIV that isnt even out yet! And im not expecting them to take a loss, Do you know how long ago Spirits Within even came out?? Long time ago, besides that I highly dought they went bankrupt from that movie. They pursued online gaming because people thought it would be cool to have an online Final Fantasy, whether they were bankrupt or not what ever. Were all entitled to our opinion.

  9. #9

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Chocobo King View Post
    Im just saying theres alot of great online games out there that you only have to pay for the game and never have to pay again, and the only thing you have to pay is for the expansions. Im sure Square makes enough money from all its customers and fans worldwide to be able to host the servers so we dont have to pay again. Id be happy to pay for upgrades on it like new expansions, but we shouldnt have to pay a monthly fee.
    Which ones? CS? TF2? L4D? FPS games don't require the level of upkeep and and you still pay dearly for DLC even if it's very minute. For all intents and purposes OFPS (or RTS like WC3) games are essentially single player games. The devs make the content one time and then tell people to just drop in often using the players' personal servers. There's very little upkeep and very little further developments (unless you pay for it which is the majority of cases).

    I can't really think of any really good free to play MMOs. Any that are even half-way decent still have a large pay element to get past a certain level or to buy a piece of gear you want.

    If there are other examples let me know about them.


    Content is the name of the game in an MMO. Running 10 maps for an FPS where people (usually no more than 20 at a time) can use their own private servers instead of loading your servers is a joke. Running several extremely large persistent worlds that each accommodate 2000-4000 exclusively to their own server is a bit different. You have non-player characters in the form of shops and monsters. You have a ton of balance issues, you have to make a ridiculous amount of items, balance economies, etc.

    Just from a design perspective it's a much huger task. Even though I think SE does a fairly shabby job, I still think they deserve to get paid for continued work on the game they are keeping up.

    Also what Ouch! said is definitely true. You've gotta think from a business perspective. Even the F2P MMOs and similar online FPS are made to make money one way or another.


  10. #10
    diafnaoplzkthnxbai NeoTifa's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    in psy's panties <3
    Posts
    3,411

    Default

    Yea, I'm in college, have to pay for rent, insurance, cell phone, internet, etc. and can't afford to pay monthly for a game that I'm only gonna play on weekends after homework...
    Oh gods, why? ಥ_ಥ


  11. #11

    Default

    Well if you can't afford to pay for a game you won't have much time to play then payment shouldn't be the biggest issue anyway. Unlike offline games, MMOs keep going without you. FFXI is the worst of them, though FFXIV is supposed to be more casual, but if you've got a busy life then MMOs probably aren't for you anyway... to that point that paying or not shouldn't be an issue.


    Perhaps its a consumerist attitude that we have of "If I pay for it then it had very well better be something I can hold in my hand that nobody can ever take away from me." Or maybe it's the ubiquitous pirate mentality where so many people think they shouldn't have to pay for what other people make.


    I suppose you think you should only pay for your internet connection when you use it. Because if you're not downloading at max bandwidth 247/ you're not getting all of what you're paying for.


  12. #12

    Default

    I agree to that they need to get payed for their creations. I think they probly say "hey they want an online FF, lots of people did XI, and we can probly get a little money out of it."

    But for instance GW is an online only game, and its free to play, I think its a pretty cool game, they have daily maintence, and update ver. often enough, MGO is free to play, they have maintence every week and have new things come out all the time.

    Yeah ill probly end up getting it and more then likely pay to play it if it isnt to much. im not trying to offend anyone here, but theirs alot of other people that like and play FF a lot, and our money is tight because of other bills, so we cant always be able to end up paying for an awesome game we wish we could play.

  13. #13

    Default

    Big difference between GW and other MMOs is that the GW world is not persistent. GW is an MMO the same way D2 is an MMO. From the sheer business side of it, upkeep isn't as money-munching for such a game. As I recall, GW, like most OFPS games only allows a very small number of people in a given instanced zone at a given time. Running the bandwidth to allow 24 people in a given instance is nothing compared to running a persistent world with 2000-4000 people.

    Some people don't care that GW is a non-persistent-world game. Plenty of others do want that. They want the community that comes with a server being an entity unto itself with it's own people, the same people, every time.

    MGO falls into a similar category of having a very small number of people per instanced game.


    I also think if you compared the content developed for a game like GW to that of other MMOs, GW would fall far behind and you'd pay for 95% of it in the expansions.

    FFXI isn't the best example of continually generated content, but they do have major updates (post expansion) that add quite a lot to the game. If you like at something like WoW, Blizzard is churning out a ridiculous amount of content at breakneck pace on top of maintaining several hundred servers which can each host several thousand players simultaneously.

    TL;DR version. Bandwidth costs more for persistent world games and less for instanced games. Above all, you're paying for the bandwidth just like you would your internet connection.


  14. #14
    Zachie Chan Recognized Member Ouch!'s Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2002
    Location
    Miami
    Posts
    7,652
    Articles
    3

    FFXIV Character

    Swygwyrd Eryistyrmstn (Sargatanas)
    Contributions
    • Hosted Screenname Competitions

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Chocobo King View Post
    Thats fine, but im not talking about XI, im talking about XIV that isnt even out yet! And im not expecting them to take a loss, Do you know how long ago Spirits Within even came out?? Long time ago, besides that I highly dought they went bankrupt from that movie. They pursued online gaming because people thought it would be cool to have an online Final Fantasy, whether they were bankrupt or not what ever. Were all entitled to our opinion.
    First of all, Squaresoft suffered almost $94,000,000 losses from producing The Spirits Within. They had opened a completely new studio to produce the game and had to shut it down immediately afterwards because of the movie's massive box office failure. The beginning of FFXI's development also coincides rather closely with the movie's release and subsequent massive loss for the company. It's not a matter of opinion; MMORPGs are cash cows. You'd have to be blind to think that the massive failure of The Spirits Within and then the production of an MMORPG are unrelated.

    At any rate, Yearg has already addressed why the games you've brought up as examples for your argument aren't valid comparisons, so I won't bother addressing that.

    Also, you say you're not expecting Square Enix to take a loss on FFXIV, but then you jumped to my point about the Spirits Within, which was misdirected. Let's break down the costs of a persistent-world MMORPG.

    First, you've got to pay the development team. For an MMORPG, I'd wager that group is likely larger than a dev. team for any offline title.

    Second, MMORPGs have much more interaction between the producer and the consumer. This means that you've got to expand your customer service. While Square Enix's customer service for FFXI is most certainly some of the most ridiculous junk I've ever encountered, I can still assure you that it's expensive.

    Third, perhaps you might lump this under customer service, but keep in mind you've also got to pay for your Game Masters--those in game whose responsibilities it is to settle disputes between players and Terms of Services breeches.

    But wait, don't forget to add in the massive costs associated with servers capable of maintaining these kinds of worlds. That's a pretty penny all by itself.

    With all these costs, I can hardly imagine that Square Enix can afford to not charge at least some sort of monthly fee. Expansions are too far and few between to sustain a game with such costs, and most people would balk at paying more than $30 for them anyway.

    You can argue all you want that monthly fees might suck for the consumer (I'd argue that I get my money's worth, and as soon as I stop feeling that way, I'll stop paying), but it's hard to justify yourself from a business perspective. It doesn't make an ounce of sense. Companies aren't altruistic, and I can guarantee you the people who put the money up to make these games in the first place aren't doing it because their primary goal is to let you have fun. They do it to make money.

    MMORPGs are not only expensive to make (as all games are these days), but they're also expensive to maintain. It would stand to reason that, as a result, they might be more expensive to play. As has been discussed elsewhere in this thread, as long as you play your MMORPG for a decent amount of time each month, it's potentially the cheapest entertainment you'll get from a video game.
    Last edited by Ouch!; 07-18-2009 at 05:46 AM. Reason: Did a fact check!

  15. #15
    Score: 0 out of 2 Dignified Pauper's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2001
    Location
    Ohio
    Posts
    6,036

    Default

    Point of the matter is, if you have other bills and can't afford to get an online game, then get your priorities straight. Games are a leisure activity. Bills are a financial responsibility.

    It's about as bad as when people call and say "I can't afford my cell phone bill. It's too high, I can't even buy as much at the grocery." And said people have unlimited texting, data, and 900 minutes. I offer to reduce their services. "NO! I shouldn't have to, you should lower your damn price!"

    It's just as ridiculous. Get a better job, or wait until you've got better handle on your bills.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •