Except that if someone is making such a ridiculous claim, shouldn't we be able to discuss why they're wrong, bringing up point for point the faults like I did on the previous page? Its not much of a discussion if everyone is just saying "yah its good and heres why" especially when those reasons why tend to be full of it/invalid when compared.
Not to mention he pretty much welcomed it in the first post with saying "If you doubt it, you'll have to go through me."
(And to the mods, sorry for the insults, I have a tendency to be a bit of an arrogant asshole, I know =/ I try and refrain most of the time, but I can let things slip)
-----
Back to the discussion at hand
Except hes right. By all means like the characters. Theres no problem with that. But don't say they were well written and developed when they were not, as that is objectively false.