Never written anything in a documentary format, myself (the "mock" variety or otherwise); it is something I have occasionally wondered about, and invariably something I believe I would struggle with. I am averse to interviewing others with any degree of formality, for one thing (least of all strangers, which pretty much finishes me in the social documentary style, I guess :\), and I have generally found that I am able to express my ideas better in a basic prose style than anything else. I certainly enjoy viewing a good documentary, though; what was your subject, out of curiosity? Any chance of hearing one of your more humorous lines?Originally Posted by Shoeberto
True, that. Despite the disgust that most of my information on the publishing industry has evoked, I am actually quite appreciative of legitimate criticism, particularly when it illuminates a weakness that I am completely unaware of. Yes, it would frustrate the hell out of me to have to rewrite entire chapters based upon someone's criticism, but I would ultimately be gratified that the offending flaw was located, and relieved when the situation was rectified. But I must agree with the critical assessment, and it is when discussions of publishing economics (wordcounts) or social trends (say, removal of a character who the public at large is unlikely to identify with) are involved that I no longer care to listen, as it is clearly not my work being discussed, but the publisher's concerns for his business. A good literary discussion, though, I am almost perpetually up for. ^_^Originally Posted by Shoeberto
Accepted and appreciated.Originally Posted by Shoeberto
I'd read it.Originally Posted by The Space Pope
![]()






Reply With Quote