Beyond that, I'm just concerned about game content being regulated by the concept older people (in the regulating position) have of what gaming is. It is for kids. Doesn't matter if you stick an M rating on it, it's for kids and therefore no game should have blood or violence and even if we do allow those since they are all over TV


YOU CAN'T HAVE SEX IN SOMETHING MEANT FOR KIDS ZOMG!!!!

Seriously, you don't have to get sleazy and nudity/sexuality =/= maturity, but there are times it has a place. I hate the cliché in film where a woman always has the sheets pulled over her breasts after sex or people always have sex under the covers. Who the fack does that? Not me. But games get it even worse. You can't even consider putting nudity in games without people losing it.

A single breast or even simulated sex with no nudity in a video game would tend to have the ESRB leaning toward AO. That's she stupidity. If it fits with the theme whether it's a book, a movie, a game, a piece of art hung in a gallery... don't censor it.

The thought that games are for children (even though the numbers show that the average gamer is well over 18) is largely what makes parents groups so apoplectic when there is any mature content in game, yet the same doesn't apply to movies (with an R rating) with 80 F words, full-frontal nudity, strong sexual content, and extreme, graphic violence.

R rated movies are for adults. M rated games are for children.