WHICH IS IRRELEVANT to no Nautilus's being on Ultimecia's paintingOriginally Posted by Serapy
Yes. I can. It's the default claim of your claim that it IS symbolic of something.You cannot just claim that a visual image without any dialogue cannot be a symbolism automatically. VIII includes fixed dogma, and therefore, chances are that dialogues wouldn't be unnecessary to appear.
Or a shop front that no attention is ever drawn to by anyone or anything in game.What's definitely not a symbolism is such a thing as ... a paint or a wall basic texture.
SO YOUR EXCUSE IS INVALID, GOOD DAY.You weren't being specific in the first place.
I did. To illustrate a point. That you are completely unable to understand analogy is telling.You mentioned them, not me.
Put another way, I brought them up. You were the one who thought I said they were in the image.
It is STILL a leap from them being rare to 'ZOMFG MASS MARKETING!'I said Cid or whoever else.
Okay, you categorically AREN'T reading what I'm saying, child. NOTHING I said should lead you to thinking I said there were specialists en masse.Anyway, are you implying that Cid looking for a gunblade specialist means that there's already a large amount of gunblade specialits out there?
And not all explanations are of equal probability.Keyword: possibility. Not absolute. And this is just one explanation, there are other explanations.
I submit for the consideration of EVERYONE EVER, that you have absolutely ZERO reading comprehension skills. My comment on your sig of Phillip J. Fry as your sig was to inquire about a Delta wave. You missed this FUTURAMA reference, then thought I meant Future Esthar, then when I expressed disbelief that you apparently didn't know where your signature came from, you thought I was insulting him.Don't insult Future Esthar!
This is no personal attack, this is undeniable now.
Reply With Quote