Ultimecia`s Physical Consciousness and the year of VIII (1572)

[Serapy]

You can apply this explanation as to why Edea doesn't revert back to her normal look instantly, too.

Or she doesn't change clothes. Aside from the scarring to her face, which was corruption by the sorceress power, and which may or may not have reverted instantly, everything else is her clothing.

We don't have magic in reality, but we can have clothes.
If VIII has magic that can create anything, it wouldn't make sense if they use clothes for thier appearances.

It's one of the explanations as to why this is the case. Matron doesn't change back to normal instantly after the defeat could be due to the side-effect... it's like the withdrawal process of not using drugs for a certain amount of time.

In other words, YOU MADE IT UP.

No, I was trying to use an analogy.

I'd agree with you if VIII didn't include anything that's from real life things - arts, paintings and histories.
Ultimecia's castle and Artemisia's castle look quite identical to each other, not to mention thier reasonings...

Such arts as? I'm seeing claims here, but not seeing you backing them up with proof. The world of FFVIII is not ours. Similar items to ours do not make it share our history any more than the Texas sign in FF7 means it's our world.

It's silly and wrong to claim proof that two identical arts are just... that identical to each other.

VIII is not something that's 100% fool proof. Claiming proof on something other than dialogues is ridiculous.

I'm a disingenuous git now? That's pretty new to me! Thank you, and if you don't mind, I'll add it to my 'lol getting names' vocabulary!

No, bridgedweller, you are being disingenuous. This isn't name calling. I'm telling you what you're doing is really valid point and i'm impressed by your thinking.ning, an inherently dishonest act.

Git is a 'noun' and provides the meaning of 'a person, especially a man, who is stupid or unpleasant'.

Disingenuous is an adjective, and can be used with any noun. Hence, you called me a disingenuous git. That's name calling, or a personal attack.

You've called me strange names - such words that don't exist on the dictionary. The answer is obvious, isn't it?

Yet again, you base a theory on nothing, overthink that nothing, then insist it must be so.

Why do I have to find evidence that this VIII model looks the same as a model in real life? That's impossible! So, if they look exactly the same, do you apply common sense to this? That they are in fact the same...?

You have to find evidence because that is your claim and the model does not look the same as the helm you claim it looks like. You see a similiarity where none exists.

I'm not claiming anything, my friend.

Note- When Ultimecia leaves Edea in this time period, you can assume that she's no longer connected with her at the moment. Yet she still has the same appearance.

Which only supports your idea if your idea is already assumed true. Circular reasoning at its best.

I'm not going into a circle and repeat that something must be true.