"she's like a rockstar in the conservative movement."

[Rad Bromance]

I love her! She's like, the Beyonce of the GOP!

[The Man]

Socialism is terrible. She is terrible. One of them is a lot more likely to get power in my region than the other. Thus it is worse than the other.

No offence, but I find it difficult to imagine anyone who would rather live in a country run by Sarah Palin than live in, say, Sweden without being either a christian or a smurfing idiot. Granted, you pointed out that she probably won't get power in the U.K., but she probably won't get power in the U.S. too. It's just stupid.

I like how you commies only say "But X isn't really socialist, not really" when it's a bad place. When it's a decent place, despite the fact that it is not socialist in any respect (As we are all well aware that a somewhat larger welfare system than average =! socialism), you're all about it as a paragon of the success of socialism.

I was using socialism in the same manner in which I presumed Psy to be using it, since my observations of British politics have led me to conclude that the odds of workers taking control of the economy in Britain is about the same as it is here. Technically you're right, Sweden is a social democracy, but most people are sloppy and don't really bother distinguishing between the terms. The only place I'm aware of that actually comes close to being real socialism in the world right now is Cuba, which has a ty trade embargo preventing it from reaching its economic potential, but it's a top-controlled dictatorship, which is pretty far removed from worker control of the economy. A good example of worker-controlled socialism existed during the Spanish Civil War, but due to the number of outside influences conspiring to end the Catalan territories' autonomy it was pretty short-lived.

[Moon Rabbits]

Socialism is terrible. She is terrible. One of them is a lot more likely to get power in my region than the other. Thus it is worse than the other.

No offence, but I find it difficult to imagine anyone who would rather live in a country run by Sarah Palin than live in, say, Sweden without being either a christian or a smurfing idiot. Granted, you pointed out that she probably won't get power in the U.K., but she probably won't get power in the U.S. too. It's just stupid.

I like how you commies only say "But X isn't really socialist, not really" when it's a bad place. When it's a decent place, despite the fact that it is not socialist in any respect (As we are all well aware that a somewhat larger welfare system than average =! socialism), you're all about it as a paragon of the success of socialism.

I was using socialism in the same manner in which I presumed Psy to be using it, since my observations of British politics have led me to conclude that the odds of workers taking control of the economy in Britain is about the same as it is here. Technically you're right, Sweden is a social democracy, but most people are sloppy and don't really bother distinguishing between the terms. The only place I'm aware of that actually comes close to being real socialism in the world right now is Cuba, which has a ty trade embargo preventing it from reaching its economic potential, but it's a top-controlled dictatorship, which is pretty far removed from worker control of the economy. A good example of worker-controlled socialism existed during the Spanish Civil War, but due to the number of outside influences conspiring to end the Catalan territories' autonomy it was pretty short-lived.

Yesssssssum~~~~ Anarchy baaaaaaaaaaayby~