Spider man without....spider man

[Bunny]

The only person on that list who even comes close to being capable of handling an action star role is Shia Labeouf (and the success of that is very minimal). Pattison, Radcliffe and Efron are all absolutely terrible choices if you are trying to be serious about the revitalization a serious franchise. The article is absolutely terrible (surprise surprise, coming from that source) since it focuses specifically on the act of making money through placing big named "teenage" actors into further spotlight. A movie's ability to make money is important so far as not being a complete bust but completely hurts any chance of successfully revitalizing something like Spider-Man. It'd piss off the core audience which is who Sony should be appealing too, not teenage girls who have never picked up a comic book in their lives.

I don't really care about the films (or the character itself) but this sort of Hollywood thing angers me and is the reason most of the films out now are absolute drivel. I know that list isn't official but it's ignorant nonetheless.