Selphie and Vanille

[Hardcoresquall]

Well, I'm not sure if you're talking seriously about the S=R-Theory or just kidding around, but it's crap. I may be wrong, but as far as I know, There shouldn't be a "Selphie" in the game. Rinoa was later replaced by Selphie. You can see a lot of Screenshots of the Trial-Version, where Rinoa is standing at the beach of the Dollet-Mission or something like that. But in the full version of Final Fantasy VIII, it's Selphies' part.

[Serapy]

Well, I'm not sure if you're talking seriously about the S=R-Theory or just kidding around, but it's crap. I may be wrong, but as far as I know, There shouldn't be a "Selphie" in the game. Rinoa was later replaced by Selphie. You can see a lot of Screenshots of the Trial-Version, where Rinoa is standing at the beach of the Dollet-Mission or something like that. But in the full version of Final Fantasy VIII, it's Selphies' part.

Read this thread:
http://forums.eyesonff.com/final-fan...2-s-pov-2.html

Especially:
and



These are canon, because they do exist in the retail version. It doesn't even matter if these were editing errors.

[Darth Cid]

Have you seen 'The End' before? Did you notice something strange about the background of the 'The End'? It doesn't match Selphie at all... and it's very obvious that it resembles the background where Rinoa was standing at the beginning of the game. And if SE didn't move this skill, imagine Rinoa using her 'The End' limit break and people going 'z0mfg R=U is now teh trueeetthhzzzzzzzzz'

But then when I saw Vanille, that would explain why SE moved the Death limit break to Selphie... It's obvious that Selphie is happy happy and very positive in VIII. Same goes for Vanille. And they both have the same death spell? I guess, the way how the Japanase puts it... these embraced positive feelings can make very good results; such results that can be very very powerful, like the Death spell.

z0mfg R=U is now teh trueeetthhzzzzzzzzz

And so is R=S!

[Vermachtnis]

The next obvious step is Rinao is Legion.

[Darth Cid]

I have no idea what that means unless you mean by biblical reasons but while we're making people other people.

Rinoa = Lulu
Rikku = Selphie
Aerith = Dead person
Rinoa = Not Dead Person
Lulu = Could Be Dead Person
Ultimecia = White Mage from FF1
=
:objection: =
:luigi: = :magus:

[The Crystal]

If Selphie and Vanille are so alike, does that make Selphie a lesbian? Awesome!

[BG-57]

If you really want to replace Rinoa with Selphie, just read Imadoki! Nowadays. Koki and Tanpopo resemble Squall and Selphie so much it's kind of scary.

[rubah]

My new favorite quote.

It doesn't even matter if these were editing errors.

[Jiro]

Mind you, the shadow still looks like Rinoa's in that escape scene. However, this means jack. Because Aeris is playable in the FFVII demo which iirc takes place inside Mako Reactor Number 1, and yet is absent in the final product. They only do it to show off (main) characters.

[leader of mortals]

My favorite thing about Serapy is how he abandons his threads once he realizes people don't believe it.

Also, read Jiro's post.

[Serapy]

If I couldn't think of something -insert word here- to say, I just become inactive. If I have something to say, I say it here. That's it.

As you may be aware, defending my theories WON'T make people change thier minds at all. It'll be a complete waste of time if I attempt so. I rather make a new thread about something else than being all defensive.

And why should you expect people to believe you? That's pretty deep.

[BG-57]

Not to make too fine a point of it, but as the originator of this hypothesis, it is up to you to provide evidence to convince us that it is plausible.

I am not hostile to your hypotheses per se, but I remain unconvinced so far.

[Rodney]

If Selphie and Vanille are so alike, does that make Selphie a lesbian? Awesome!

Depends. Is Vanille one?

[Moon Rabbits]

The next obvious step is Rinao is Legion.

Yes.

[Serapy]

Not to make too fine a point of it, but as the originator of this hypothesis, it is up to you to provide evidence to convince us that it is plausible.

I am not hostile to your hypotheses per se, but I remain unconvinced so far.

You're the latest person to mention 'gimme mah evidence naooo', so far.

This is more like a discussion. I still don't get why people force me to make everything Einstein-a like.

You know, if one outright claims that something is definite, it doesn't always mean that it'll become a thing like hypothesis. R is U, for example. Come on, that's just ridiculous. Does your mind really have to do the calculations in order to finally conclude that R is indeed U? If all of us are like that, Religions would have never existed.