Ah, Esuna. That was the one I was thinking of. I remember after seeing Eiko's selection of spells, there was something that made her more preferable to Garnet, but couldn't remember why aside from Garnet's lack of Holy [for whatever reason I really like Holy, it's always been one of my favourite spells JUST because]. But it's strange that Garnet also lacked Might and Full Life, which I certainly don't remember. I suppose this was done to make Eiko appealing somehow as a character? But I never really cared for her that much, and I wish that she didn't join your party so that Garnet could have all of the abilities that were stolen from her by Eiko. I don't understand the notion of forcing two characters into a party that are both basically the exact same class/same concept/etc. Usually when this is done, the designers attempt to balance them out to give them equality in their pros and cons to balance each other out, which always fails and 80% of the audience ends up preferring one over the other.Originally Posted by Wolf Kanno
Zidane, Vivi, Steiner, Freya.
Can I ask why? I don't remember much about her, other than the fact that she doesn't get Holy and one other white magic spell that's escaping my memory at the moment.
Eiko gets a better selection of White Magic (the majority of Dagger's are single target single status heals) such as Holy, Esuna, Might, and Full Life. She also has better spirit stat so she heals better.
I really hate little girls, unless it's the Red Queen.
Reply With Quote