Quote Originally Posted by The Last Oath View Post
The points I can remember from the article that really make this theory credible are:

*Ultimechia just happens to "summon" Griever.. the same lion on squalls necklace.
It is explained that she read Squall's mind and copied the "GF" based on his own dispair - the "nothing" land is Squall's dispair.

*Everything in the flashback at the end of the game is from disc 1 except the rinoa in the space suit.
They also had scenes from disc 3, and disk 2. Like the Garden Battles, the Ragnarok

*Squall gets Rinoa even though she showed interest in only Seifer throughout disc 1
She showed memories in Seifer, she showed plenty of interest in Squall. I can give examples if you want.

*Some of the events after disc 1 had no hinting to in disc 1.
They all had hinting - they where just done in a way so that they are noticed after you discover what they where hinting to. Again, I can give examples.

The only thing in the game I can think of that doesnt, 100% confirm this theory for me is when Irvine says on the train to Deiling, "Maybe its Fate". after "re-meeting" with Selphie.
There where also plenty of other scenes like that.

Magnificent Theory by the author though
.
It was an interesting theory, it's just I can see too many hints against it. Nice work by the author though, although he has a bit of an attitude problem I think - he clearly hates the romantic side of the game, (see his coments on Eyes On Me...)