Quote Originally Posted by NeoCracker View Post
The only two in there I find that legitimate are 2 and 5, and 2 doesn't even really create a problem. 5 could be explained easy enough if they took a bit of time to do so however, it's just sad you never really get an explanation.
Thats how I see it. They could have explained it easily enough so its not a real sort of plothole that makes no sense. Just a little dissapointing that it didnt get explained though.

Also, some people are really going out of their way to break the game and then bash it. Try listening to the Hotspot podcast, what a joke. Everyone on that thought it was a very good game with some problems but one guy, Brendan Sinclair obviously went out of his way to completely break the game and had no intention to follow the narrative at all, and completely bashes the game for not holding up on that. He got called out a lot at least, which is good.

You can do the same with Mass Effect 2 but obviously he didnt try that...

Its definitely not a perfect game, but great nonetheless.