
Originally Posted by
seiferalmasy2
- Serious hate by more game magazines and online sites than ever before, edge gave it 50 check
*sighs*
Final Fantasy XIII (ps3) reviews at Metacritic.com
53 - Favourable
8- Mixed
1 - Unfavourable.
Yes, it was so hated upon!
Heck, this is just Western reviews!
------
I'm not saying people can't hate it. Heck, I can't get into FFVIII and most of my friends LOVE the game. But I don't appreciate when people spout half-truths as fact, used unreliable sources as if they were credible and conveniently take things out of quotes out of context. All of which you have done in the past.
So there are no towns and no NPCs? Actually, there are it just
Hello Plotyou are a wanted by the gov't (Sanctum) and loathed by masses, sure you're a real crowd pleaser.
Linear? Okay, I get this, it is very linear but most JPRGs, e.g. Final Fantasies, are as well. Sure, it is a spectrum where you have games like FFX and FFXIII on one end (very linear) and FFXII on the other (more open, but still linear). If you want sandbox, you are totally looking at the wrong genre, try Western and Console RPGs and MMORPGs.
Sidequests? Oh yeah they are basically like the hunts in FFXII. Though as far as asinine quests go hunting down a specific enemies/Marks is up there with being the world's bitch boy and running around exchanging items à la Legend of Zelda.
Combat System? Sure there is no micro-managing and that sucks for those who like to micro-manage. For the most part the AI is solid. And it is not the first RPG to only allow you to control a single character. Persona 3 is considered by many on of the best JRPG experience on the PS2 and you only control one character of a team of 4, and can change the AI setting of each team member accordingly in battle. I get that it is not everyone's cup of tea, but the battles can be difficult and rewarding at the same time.
Not a RPG? Yes, that gets misquoted a lot. If you read what was actually said it is reference to how they were trying to break the mold of the genre and not be confined within it. That's why the game, in certain respects, is so different from your typical RPG cuz that's what they were going for.
Bottom line: Final Fantasy means different things to most people though general there is a Cid and Chocobo among other recurring themes. However, at the end of the day, Final Fantasy, sadly, is whatever Sqaure-Enix says it is. :/
My point? While all the things I mention (as well as other things) can be turn off to people, at the end of the day it does not mean it is a
bad game. Different, yes. Not everyone's cup of tea? Most definitely. Bad game? No.
Not liking/hating the game != bad game. Sure, it might be a bad game to
you, but it is a far cry from being a bad game, objectively speaking.
*
*By bad game, I mean a broken game that is not worth the DVD it was made on, and few--if any--people would actually enjoy the experience.