Results 1 to 15 of 125

Thread: Overratedroth.

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by seiferalmasy2 View Post
    It is not Seraph, that Wiki is wrong. We should know given we have spent 6 months researching and comparing, and I am in consultation with 10 japanese speakers. look carefully:

    Seraph Comb > セラフコーム > Serafu Kōmu > Seraph Comb [anyone still complaining that Sepher Sephiroth is wrong, please note the differences]

    セラフ Seraph

    ]Safer・Sephiroth
    セーファ・セフィロス
    Seefa Sefirosu
    Sepher Sephiroth
    [This one always gets attention. Firstly, Sepher Sephiroth is inspired by the Seraph Seraph - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
    But Sēfa does not make Seraph. This is a misconception. The word translates to either Sefer or Sepher (both are ok) and is Hebrew/Kabbalistic (as is Sephiroth)
    Sephirot - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
    Sefer Yetzirah - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
    Sefer Torah - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
    I am told by Gemini that Sepher is closer than Sefer and since Sephiroth is spelled by "Seph" it seems much more logical. Therefore, Sepher Sephiroth is the name. ]
    I can confirm that. I have the japanese version and "Sepher" ist correct.

    Trashypedia is the last website I would trust. I website were every single idiot can edit something? even correct things? No, thanks!

    Khalin, I hope you don't really think I would post 30 names here and now just because you want it.

    And PuPu the same mistakes you make all the time is:

    Step 1 - A says something
    Step 2 - B (you) says "no, it is the opposite, prove you are right!"
    Step 3 - A doesn't prove it because maybe there are not enough official facts and says "you want to tell me you are right now prove what you have said" - in my case I simply cannot decide what's true because I am no member of Square-Enix and can only use what they "give" me
    Step 4 - B (you) says "ha! you are wrong because you cannot prove it (which is wrong as well because I cannot decide what's right about Final Fantasy and just because I cannot prove something it is not automatically wrong, Square could still have decided it is the truth but they just didn't want to tell us (example)
    Step 5 - B (you) says "i do not have to prove what I have said! you cannot prove your argument you are wrong and I am right!" but you forget you have no more right than I to decide what's wrong in Final Fantasy and who knows? just because person A doesn't prove it you argument is not automatically right and as long as you have not proven your argument right it is as worthy as the unproven argument - because it is unproven as well.

    So it is simply 1:1 and not 0:1.

    Also it is not a natural law the first one who says something has to prove something so the second one can then try to prove his argument. It can be vice-versa.

    EDIT: I have forgotten to mention it is impossible for Square to show he can really use a Super Nova in the story. And I think you know why. It is obvious. But actually I have already mentioned. And it doesn't mean just because they didn't show, he is not able to do this. It would be just hard to tell how the story continues when he uses a Super Nova.
    Also like I have told you Sephiroth is the character with the strongest will which is officially stated by Square and Cloud's will is very "weak" which is officially stated by Square as well. So this is definitely not his advantage he can use to defeat Sephiroth.
    Last edited by Sephiroth; 04-17-2010 at 12:07 AM.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •