One of these days, Del, one of these days, you’re going to actually stick to something you already said. If you want to ignore this thread, then go do that, but you said a couple of times you were going to leave it open for another staff member to close if they want, and none have shown the inclination. So yet again I am forced to open this.
Excellent way to completely ignore my question. You’ve just been answering completely different, made-up accusations so far; at least you’re now being more explicit.Originally Posted by Shlup
It is interesting that we have yet another contestant who explicitly said she wouldn’t bother if, like Breine, she knew a hypothetical negative truth to begin with. It’s getting harder and harder to justify Breine’s exclusion.
Freya: I’m not going to get into this with you, but you don’t seem to understand really what’s going on (I’m not sure how closely you’ve been following this thread) or what’s actually been said (I did nothing like call this event a “social event”). I’ve said nothing directed at the contestants – I said their views could (and likely would) change if they knew any predetermined staff conclusion on them like Breine did, and several contestants’ statements in this thread prove that. I also said the events sure looked like a simple way to exploit eager contestants – some may value the CK position more than others, so I can’t say they are definitely getting a bad deal, IF the competition was honest. Also, I’m not sure how you can honestly read this thread and say I’m the exclusive “rude” one, considering I was playing nice until well after Shlup started cussing and name-calling earlier in the thread.
rubah: I agree about the cheaper beer.