I'm going to write a letter to President Obama letting him know that all the votes he got mean nothing. He should have been elected based on his diary entries about McCain!
Man, are you guys serious? I mean, "Post 12 threads" "Decide with a team who you think wouldn't be a good CK!", both is jumping through hoops, both the staff can disregard, both will have presumed notions and favorites. Next time the staff needs CK's they should just do it the old fashioned way, apparently we have people who don't enjoy fun.
My point; it's all pointless jumping through hoops when you really think about, not just this event one, but the last two as well. It's not something to freak out over, really. You like the way Del did it, because it had the appearance of you mattering. But I can guarantee without knowing exactly what's been said in the staff forum, in each of these CK events, some people have come in with no chance, others as favorites, others as undecided. It's a fun way to get the forum "involved" with picking the CK. This newest task is just because Shlup's pissed at people for being spoil sports.
Yet again you manage to reach up your butt and pull out some lawyer-speak without providing an actual counter argument. Suggesting voting for candidates is somehow an invalid form of selecting a winner is just stupid.
Now we're dropping this discussion in here. If you want to say something nice about Del then go ahead, otherwise this thread is getting closed.
I had no problem with how the CK competition was run until this became a Ciddies contest.
And since when was "not liking the way the CK is chosen" the same as "hating fun?"