Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 16 to 18 of 18

Thread: Why do so many people think that "IIII" was a mistake?

  1. #16

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Aerith's Knight View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Mercen-X View Post
    I like IIII better in representing 4 since IV could be mistaken as "InterVenous"...
    It's IntraVenously, and seriously, who would put that on a clock?

    That Japanese minigame was prob taken out due to the enormous amount of time it would take to do it.
    It doesn't take THAT long to do it...it was prob taken out because someone said "hey westerners won't like using their brain or getting frustrated" VII is afterall too easy.

    Hopefully a guy I know can place it back as I think taking away a minigame like that kinda lessens the game.

  2. #17

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Aerith's Knight View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Mercen-X View Post
    I like IIII better in representing 4 since IV could be mistaken as "InterVenous"...
    It's IntraVenously, and seriously, who would put that on a clock?
    :objection:First Second Next Then Finally

  3. #18
    Eggstreme Wheelie Recognized Member Jiro's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Posts
    26,942
    Articles
    65
    Blog Entries
    1
    Contributions
    • Former Cid's Knight
    • Former Editor
    • Notable contributions to former community wiki

    Default

    I recall a debate about how VIII could have been IIX or something of the sort once. As I thought then, who cares? We all get the idea.

    They see me rolling. They hating, patrolling.
    Trying to catch me riding dirty.


Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •