Well it's already been subtly pointed out that it was off-topic and not constructive so on that specific point I apologise BUT you have to see from other posters point of view, when looking at the forum all we see is thread after thread of random theories from yourself. It gets tedious, and to be honest it's painful to watch. (You are also, if I may say so, quite arrogant in your belief that these ideas are absolute solid truths and that the other 99% of people are wrong! So it sort of rubs people the wrong way, me at least)
So to get back on topic: problem I have with this theory, as with most of these theories, is that there's no evidence within the game or its accompanying literature and it doesn't make a huge amount of sense. It's a fantasy within a fantasy. It's just something you made up from 2 things that happen to match. Dysley wears blue, so he must be from the Yun clan. Fang and Vanille are old, chronologically speaking, so they must be somehow - by huge coincidence - direct ancestors of the other main characters. Snow's rebellion group has the acronym NORA so somehow Nora Estheim must be his mother. These are HUGE leaps in logic that could give some religions a run for their money!
Sure, I can't disprove it. Nor can I disprove that the planet Mars has a soft caramel centre, but it doesn't stop it from being a pretty random theory whose only basis is a lack of disproof.
Let's make another one up.. Sazh is actually a chocobo, and once ate a fal'cie experimental green that turned him into a man, and the frocobo is his son. Dajh is adopted. He has a chocobo living in his hair, so it must be true. See, I can make random theories up too, prove that one wrong![]()




Reply With Quote