While I was pleasantly surprised, there's still a level of pragmatism that takes away from them for me.
One, as great as all their announcements were, they're nearly all games I'll never get around to playing. I never finished Twilight Princess, so why would I pick up the new Zelda? Goldeneye might've been the best thing for me, but I'll probably never play it when there's already so many better console shooters on the PS3, and the original is still strong to me. Donkey Kong, Kirby, Kid Icarus... it's all great but I seriously doubt I'll ever play any of those.
Also, one of Nintendo's biggest criticisms is more than abundant this year - no new IP's. Everything Nintendo does that's exciting is from the past, and has more than 20 games to its name. Sure, Motorstorm, Killzone, and inFAMOUS all have sequels coming, but these are reimaginings of fairly new franchises
So Sony still wowed me the most, mostly because of shattering announcements and games that I know for sure I'll be playing or watching my girl play. But I have to give credit where credit is due, and Nintendo is relevant again.
I know. And Steam features on PS3 is literally a pipe dream I used to salivate about but knew could never happen in this world. I literally felt like I was hallucinating when they announced all this.Originally Posted by Vivi22
TWISTED METAL, BABY!!! And Move actually has good games. And the crapload of free content (in some cases full games) you get for buying third party games. And PSN Plus which pays for itself in the first month (too bad I already have Wipeout HD, thanks Dredz!!!).Originally Posted by I'm my own MILF
Also can I ask - how was Nintendo awful???
E3 has been great, even with the publishers; even Ubisoft had some good ones!





Reply With Quote