Basically we can assume since the onus is not on us proving this but on him disproving this:

Serapy made his thread, I tore his argument to pieces as Raistlin pointed out. Yes I did make assumptions but my assumptions were far more logical than the assumptions Serapy made, It's also true I pointed out the stupidity of your argument Serapy, though I've not outright called you stupid in this thread. Everyone else pointed out how silly a theory this was and how he didn't have evidence to prove his point. Serapy then tries to back track on it saying the theory was never intended to be valid and attempts to argue that we're all idiots for having believed his theory to be a serious attempt at all.

And since the onus is on you to disprove the above paragraph completely which you can't because face it my theory is far more believable and perceivable than your defense could manage to be...Serapy enjoy!