I think you could see her vote to save me in a few ways. 1) We're both scum and we know it. 2) She is scum and the scum are keeping me around to be their scapegoat. 3) Felt sorry for me, which I serious doubt in this game. 4) Is telling the truth about her reasoning. Take those things as you will, because I know how I'm being painted. That being said, however, I would like to take the opportunity to delve into some of the bigger aspersions cast upon me.
I fail to see how my behavior thus far is scummy. Until this post I have employed no logic whatsoever in my voting style because there was no type of evidence upon which to base a vote. I could've voted for Medusa, because she had snakey hair. Because that line of logic is way gooder and smart. My initial vote was for Hermes because, and here's where I was actually being stupid, I thought he'd made a legitimate roleclaim that'd been edited to RONALD REAGAN by Zeus Murder. After realizing the error of my ways, I just kept my vote with Hermes for no other reason than he was pissing me off. However, I also knew that Hermes would never be in any danger of being lynched. Just in danger of getting his ass whipped by me. When one has no evidence to go upon, one makes a safe vote that will not get one in trouble. Or so I thought, anyway. Not only did the majority of the other gods accuse me of acting scummy for being random, though several of them admitted to making their day 0 votes at random; they also basically accused me of being dumb.
Take from the above whatever you like, I'll go on with my suspicions below.
I think Apollo is behaving rather suspiciously. He has, several times through the course of this thread, chastised bandwagon behavior. However, his vote for me seems pretty strange. Shortly after Hermes and I started our war of words Apollo admonished the both of us for arguing, saying that it was distracting. These posts followed:
Within a single interaction Apollo went from chastising both of us to calling for my severe punishment for "overly defensive behavior." Beg pardon? Hermes was the first to be defensive over my vote for him. I admittedly retaliated, but I didn't even instigate the war of words and I was accused of being overly defensive.
This, though, is what really concerns me.
I have no issue with the vote for me, but I have an issue with the reasoning employed. He has no suspicion of Hermes and considers me at complete fault for the ensuing fallout, which other gods may also. Even so, I made a "safe vote" with a semi-ridiculous reasoning and was raked over the coals for it. That's not even the weirdest part of this line of reasoning, though. It gets weirder, because Apollo then states he believes my posting of "general nonsense" is a hindrance to the town. Not only is Apollo guilt of this behavior himself, he participated in her Hades/Hermes nonsense as well (discussed performing a stunner on me.) Finally... and this could be a misread... but I feel the final statement in this post accuses me of a roleclaim. Perhaps I am mistaken, perhaps Apollo meant to say my issue with a roleclaim... but I really would like to have some light shed on that statement. What roleclaim are you speaking of and how does a roleclaim make me suspicious?
While I do agree with Poseidon's assessment of his suspicions of Hestia, Hestia herself has brought some pretty damning evidence to light about Apollo, with whom I already have issue. His conflicting statements were designed to entrap her. I wonder why he's changing his tactics.
I'm not ready to make a decision at this point, because there are more people I'd like to hear from and, of course, I'd like to give Apollo a chance to respond.
Also, my doggy is dead