No. It's great, but too much of a good thing and all that. Nothing ever lasts forever.
Yeah, I know. It's called a reboot and it must be something that comic book fans and movie goers in general, are getting sick of by now.
Well, if you're a film director and you're worried about fan reactions, to the point of slavish devotion, you shouldn't be making movies in the first place. Because at the end of the day if you're a director you're making these movies for yourself and for the big fat paycheck that's gonna come in the mail.
First of all, I think Joel Schumacher made a terrific movie when he did Phone Booth but I haven't familiarized myself with any of his other work. Second of all, while another franchise implosion is a possibility, I'd like to think that the WB is smart enough to learn from their mistakes by putting a few provisos in the contract but maybe I'm giving them too much credit.
Last edited by The Fat Bioware Nerd; 02-26-2011 at 03:10 AM.
Touche
I generally hate, hearing the idea of "reboot" cause it usually means the previous story crashed and burn and while some are legitimate, I'm pretty happy with Nolan's films so I can't say that after Dark Knight Rising I'll be ready to see a new film in the next two years. Despite loving the first two Nolan films, I can't say I've been waiting in anticipation for the third film. Hell, I'm rarely waiting for a film to come out but I blame it on not being a movie guy anymore.
If you want to keep making the money though, you have to concede to some fan and studio demands. Most directors don't just say "screw the script, let me tell you how I've envisioned this" most who do, tend to be the ones who don't get a chance to make a sequel.Well, if you're a film director and you're worried about fan reactions, to the point of slavish devotion, you shouldn't be making movies in the first place. Because at the end of the day if you're a director you're making these movies for yourself and for the big fat paycheck that's gonna come in the mail.
The issue here is that if a director tackled a new film and fans end up hating it and the film bombs, you're going to have a hard time finding work afterwards or be forever reminded of your turd of a film. Considering how well Dark Knight did, Nolan himself has to worry about the new film being a success. Generally, it's intimidating for any creative producer to tackle an old IP that has been done extremely well. Regardless of coming up with your own unique and fun vision, it will still be compared to the old versions and consequently get an unfair rep because it doesn't live up to the unrealistic expectations and nostalgia vision of the older fan base.
I don't think WB is completely stupid and would probably try to keep away from the bad elements that sunk the franchise in the first place. Course there is always some stuff they could do that no one thought about that could make the series bad. Who knows.Second of all, while another franchise implosion is a possibility, I'd like to think that the WB is smart enough to learn from their mistakes by putting a few provisos in the contract but maybe I'm giving them too much credit.
True beauty exists in things that last only for a moment.
Current Mood: And it's been a long December and there's reason to believe. Maybe this year will be better than the last. I can't remember all the times I tried to tell myself. To hold on to these moments as they pass...
I agree that directors should be worried about fan reaction, but only to an extent. If they're concerned about it to the point of slavish devotion, they shouldn't be working in the movie industry at all. Because if you're confident enough about the story that you have but you're still worried about the critical reaction, it's time to quit your job and walk away.
Such as?
Yeah, I know. It's just that, we've never had a Batman series that has progressed before we've always had this concept of directors disregarding previous film continuity and going off into a different direction. It's getting old. I think regardless of whether The Dark Knight Rises is a flop or not, they should continue on in Nolan's Bat-film continuity, but maybe not right away. Maybe if Warner Bros does a poll asking the fans if they want a sequel trilogy to The Dark Knight Rises and they say "No," maybe just maybe Warner Bros could wait a long ass time before they release anymore Batman movies. Maybe they could deprive the fans of their Batman to the point of desperation. To the point where artists are singing about it on the radio, fans are getting tattoos of Batman and fans are just begging and pleading for it.
Last edited by The Fat Bioware Nerd; 03-03-2011 at 09:55 PM.
I think a second trilogy would be overdoing it quite a bit.
Proud to be the Unofficial Secret Illegal Enforcer of Eyes on Final Fantasy!
When I grow up, I want to go toBovineTrump University! - Ralph Wiggum
I can see it now: The Coen Brothers redo Batman Begins.
Basically, it's the same movie, but they cut out the climax and the ending. Still, it must be pointed out that they had some superb camera angles. Oscars are won.
Bow before the mighty Javoo!
You guys are okay with Warner Bros. just rebooting Batman every eight-to-ten-to-fifteen years? I mean what's the point of watching another reboot if you know or assume that Warner Bros. is just gonna outright kill that continuity within the seven year span of a second sequel? (a.k.a threequel?)
If you couldn't tell by my post, I do not want the Coen brothers to direct any Batman movie. I, too, would like for continuity. But it won't happen.
Bow before the mighty Javoo!
Yeah, I know it won't happen....Unless the people, the fans, ban together and boycott any Batman film that doesn't follow Christopher Nolan's continuity, but that won't happen either. You wanna know why? Because people are idiots. And just because one minority of people does or doesn't want something, doesn't mean it's going to evolve into a revolution where the revolutionaries ultimately end up getting what they want.
Last edited by The Fat Bioware Nerd; 03-03-2011 at 11:18 PM.
Also, Christopher Nolan is a smart enough man to know that six Batman movies is too much for one director. No great director has done that because after a while, you just want to do something else. You finish with one thing and move on to another. And Nolan certainly has many other things he can move on to.
Bow before the mighty Javoo!
Everybody assumes that I WANT Christopher Nolan to direct TWO Batman Trilogies but I assure you guys that it isn't the case. I merely want Batman to get the James Bond treatment in that, different directors and different cast members all share the same continuity that began in 2005 with Batman Begins. But that's not gonna happen. Obviously.
Why do you want that? Comic books get rebooted and retconned all the time. o_O