This is difficult, yet at the same time just as easy as it is difficult to take a shot at:
The human experience. The human process of making sense of nature and its processes. Observation, theory...A academic study.
Rules, laws, restrictions.
A illusion...
A explanation...
The physical universe...
A process that draws from incomplete data to make a true to "reality" statement...
A human pass time...
A human method, process...
A discipline that focuses on the physical universe , human experiences which are external and internal...
A psychological discipline. Just try to argue extraordinary things with a science brain...
I think that's about fair, and that's what I think, currently at this time, under these influences and conditions.
Oh, wait, something that structures the universe, defines the universe with language.
I have to look into this, thank you. I was always interested in Buddhism too.Originally Posted by Citizen Bleys
The thing here is that I'm not saying science is stupid, pointless, incorrect, I'm saying that there is more, there is far more to reality than this simple version of reality, this simply observation, the limited observations we make. There's more, lots more, and our science, I don't think is on the level. Science exists, it's right for us. We are attracted to science because we are the students, spectators, teachers, scientists of science.
Just like hollywood has crooked agendas and is greedy and lusty and we are attracted towards its agendas.
It's a human element, condition. It's the human experience.
Reply With Quote