Shiny: I would be interested in seeing those threads, if you don't mind sending the forum links to me. I imagine they were quite entertaining.
Shiny: I would be interested in seeing those threads, if you don't mind sending the forum links to me. I imagine they were quite entertaining.
My temp ban will be lifted the 14th of next month.
I see you posting now so it can't be eoeo. you must've been banned from eyes on wonderwall
Anyway you said that ghosts and spirits or something might be feasible. Can you define what a spirit IS and then explain briefly how that definition is an apt one that is wont to exist?
I cba finding the thread I made bashing astrology, but it's in here some where: DXPnet.com | message boards, horoscopes, classified ads, wwwriot, astrology information Go ape wild. The majority of the people there really believe in pretty much everything so anything you say against them gets them angry.
I don't believe in spirits, spirit, The Spirit and especially not Spirit.
i'm still waiting on spirit to define spirits and how they are likely to exist. Otherwise I refuse to consider his claim
stating your opinion or using more than 3 words does not a valid point make.
How do you know? Prove it?
Prove I'm deluded, real science wouldn't try to...
I think that any good, modern scientist, is WAYYYY past labeling things that can not be proven to be False, fake...we've been wrong many many times before about things later to be proven. better understood and just because their are hypothetical explanations to many things, any good scientist leaves room between theory and fact...
Yes, many things have explanations and can completely explain anything super natural away, but that's only because we have a limited means of observing super natural properties of the universe as we are natural beings of natural science in this universe.
I don't say ghost/ spirits are a fact because I can't not define what they are, but I know that I've had some amazing personal experiences that can not be easily explained even with modern science, but I'm quite sure that theories do exist and are not impossible to phantom with modern science if you're on that level. I never really tried to explain spirits yet, but I sort of want to give it a go, it's NOT that far fetched, AT ALL...The study of something like time travel or the holographic principal is likely to be just as complicated.
Last edited by spirit; 04-02-2011 at 03:39 AM.
[q]I don't say ghost/ spirits are a fact because I can't not define what they are, but I know that I've had some amazing personal experiences that can not be easily explained even with modern science.[/q]
Yes you can. You sensed sensations and misinterpreted the sensations as something sensational.
That's just a hypothetical, it's not proof. It's just another argument, another ignorant comment that suggests the paranormal must not exist simply because we can't explain it and we live in a existence of natural science as beings of natural science.
Witches, goblins, is primitive, so is tying the knot on advanced forms of science, and things like time travel and ghosts, etc etc, just because you're so strongly conditioned and academically lead to believe in system, structure of education and knowledge...
I've already been over how everything we know is just a illusion of the universe...it's true. We're not that special...
Last edited by spirit; 04-02-2011 at 03:47 AM.
ching chong hong kong song
lol and sing along
jump around and hit a gong
run around all day long
asians like to play ping pong
is now an argument on par with yours
If you can't keep up then don't waste my time, if we're not on the same page, then don't waste my time..
To illustrate how perception may be wrong, especially concerning the 3rd dimension. Current theoretical postulates have put forth the idea that the third dimension we perceive as depth is an illusion created from a 2 dimensional existence that essentially bends. While we operate in three dimensions because that's how we perceive it, it may not be fundamentally correct to think of existence as being such.
No, not really, here's one theoretical aspect of the universe.
In a larger and more speculative sense, the theory suggests that the entire universe can be seen as a two-dimensional information structure "painted" on the cosmological horizon, such that the three dimensions we observe are only an effective description at macroscopic scales and at low energies. Cosmological holography has not been made mathematically precise, partly because the cosmological horizon has a finite area and grows with time.(The holographic principle)
Your science is laughable it's based on simple man made calculations, observations, it's pathetic and meaningless to the infinite universe. This small little planet is all it is likely to ever mean anything to.
Do you honest to god think that a human vessel has a remote understanding of the true and pure, absolute, defined, infinite universe, all we have is segments of equations, calculations that we take out of it, and try to make sense of with our limited observations and abilities to understand those properties...
Give me a break...Language, math is a human construct, do you honest to God think God uses our mathematical system or that the universe used it in creation!? Our most brilliant theorits suggest that to decode the universe we will have to reinvent math, how's that grab you?
The universe is "coded" in a language far far FAR above your limited plains of existence, understanding...
I get temp banned here and there when I do something that pisses Psychotic off enough.