
Originally Posted by
sharkythesharkdogg

Originally Posted by
Bunny
I'm fine with it as long as the naming convention is neat.
I want to be a Snow.

Originally Posted by
NorthernChaosGod

Originally Posted by
Bunny
I'm fine with it as long as the naming convention is neat.
I want to be a Snow.
I don't believe you're from Winterfell.

Originally Posted by
Guardian XIII

Originally Posted by
NorthernChaosGod

Originally Posted by
Bunny
I'm fine with it as long as the naming convention is neat.
I want to be a Snow.
I don't believe you're from Winterfell.
stfu nerds.
You all three have to be Lannisters. Only inbreeding can explain you pizza faced, mutant freak jobs.

Bull




, they have to be
Targaryens. Targs are far more inbred then Lannisters.

Originally Posted by
ShlupQuack
I couldn't care less about marital state. It's having children out of financial ability to care for them that's immoral.

Originally Posted by
Raistlin
I consider marriage to be meaningless to begin with, so I certainly don't care if people have kids outside of it. In fact, I think more people should have kids without getting married so we could figure out some better way of naming children, instead of wife and kids taking the father's name -- a vestigial of a primitive and disgusting time when women and children were property of Man.
And before anyone says it, hyphenation is ridiculous. Personally, I think people should just make up a cool last name for their kids and forget useless middle names entirely. This would dramatically increase the variation and awesomeness of last names.
I agree with both of these poasts.
I think i have a bigger issue with people deciding to have unprotected sex out of wedlock while still admitting to your face that they don't want and can't handle kids. I think it comes with the territory, that if you're boning you should accept the biological fact that it's there to make babies.
As long as you responsibly bone with the acceptance that you could produce, and therefore need to properly care for a kid, kudos to you.
Probably doesn't help I'm in the army though. I've seen more one year marriages than one night stands in the last 5 years.
If people want to have sex and don't want kids, it's their right. Plenty of types of protection and birth control exist these days, some of which even an idiot could use properly, and in cases where one fails there's the morning after pill. And no matter how one feels about abortion, making it illegal
always results in a black market, and never actually stops abortion (case in point: El Salvador, which has criminalised it so thoroughly that people actually examine women who are suspected of having had abortions; it has not actually stopped the process from occurring, and just results in women dying from poorly executed abortions and being locked up in jails). What actually stops abortion is responsible, comprehensive sex education. Abortion went down more under Clinton, who promoted comprehensive sex education, than it did under Bush 43, who promoted just about every policy the religious right wanted him to short of actually banning abortion. As long as people aren't just smurfing casually without condoms, it's not really anything anyone should be concerned with.