I also liked the first two Spider-Man movies. Spider-Man is my favorite comic book character. While I'm not a fan of Tobey Maguire's acting, I do think the movies were entertaining as a whole.
Proud to be the Unofficial Secret Illegal Enforcer of Eyes on Final Fantasy!
When I grow up, I want to go toBovineTrump University! - Ralph Wiggum
Spiderman 2 is still the best comic book movie ever. It didn't try and play with the audience. You got Spiderman. You got a villain. You got action. You got a great movie.
Nolans Batman movies on the other hand relied too heavily on sophisticated characters and story that it kind of zapped the fun out of Superhero movies. The new Spiderman will follow suit, and I'm sure the new X-men movie will too. Shame.
Yes, who wants sophisticated characters and story after all. And if you want 'fun' Batman, go and watch the 1960s TV series.
"Excuse me Miss, do you like pineapple?"
I have nothing against the Nolans Batman movies I just think they have influenced the genre in a negative way. Punchy comic book movies like Spiderman 2 are going to be replaced by arthouse movies essentially.
I like my comic book movies to be filled with two-dimensional characters where good and bad is clearly defined. Those movies are usually more fun and aren't stretching 3 hours in length.
This twenty-year-old boy was distinguished from childhood by strange qualities, a dreamer and an eccentric. A girl fell in love with him, and he went and sold her to a brothel...
Take another look at Batman Begins. It is essentially an arthouse movie dressed up at a summer blockbuster. Although anything that assosiated it with summer blockbusters was handled poorly. Neither Batman films had any thrilling action setpieces if I recall. Some good acting though.
I thought movies were about storytelling not just pretty visuals. My bad.
Shut up, Alex.
Christopher Nolan should just make all the super hero movies, but I don't think he can make any Superman movie good. Too lame of a super hero.