?
I saw this on Facebook and how it divided people. And i like to see everyone freak out over math problems here.
?
I saw this on Facebook and how it divided people. And i like to see everyone freak out over math problems here.
Signature by rubah. I think.
It's 9 or 1. All depends on whether your 6/2 is a fraction before the bracket, or whether it's 6 divided by 2(2+1)
Unless it is specified that it is 6 all over 2(1+2) I think we are safe to assume the answer is 9.
I saw it on facebook and instantly accepted that 100% of the people who said 1 were idiots. Perhaps a bit harsh, in hindsight.
EDIT: I asked my nerdy maths friend that other infamous maths question we have around here. However that was almost immediately preceding me smashing my face into the ground so I don't remember her answer. I assume it was infuriating?![]()
The way the problem is written is stupid. If written correctly, it should appear 6/2 * (2 + 1) to make it clear. The way it is written 6/2(2+1) almost makes it seem as if it should be
6
-----
2(2+1)
It's easy to understand those idiots.
It's 9, because 6/2 is a coefficient of (1+2), in the same way it would be if the equation read 6(1+2)/2. You have to treat the brackets as a single term, BEDMAS or otherwise.
6 / 2(1 + 2) = 6 / 2 * (1 + 2)
= 6 / 2 * (3)
= 3 * 3
= 9
To get an answer of one is to treat both 2s as part of the brackets.
So ner.![]()
To be fair, the way it is written on Facebook it uses the divided by sign that is, to my knowledge, impossible to make on the keyboard.
instead of 6/2(1+2).
It's 9, nothing to see here, move along people.
9
PEMDAS is always done left to right. Q.E.D.
To be one is would have to be written as 6/(2(1+2))![]()
No math class that actually matters would ask that question. Any division that can be misunderstood should be done as a fraction. Period.
Ya basically. The division sign is too ambiguous. And if 6/2 is the coefficient why isn't it (6/2)? [I really don't know, I'm bad at math and I'm asking.]
But I have a ?.
Wouldn't 2(1+2) be the same as (2+4)? All I did was put the 2 into the parentheses. Unless of course 6/2 really is the coefficient. So then it could be solved when re written ((6/2)+(12/2))Screw your PEDMAS
It is was just 2(1+2), then yes it would be the same as (2+4) but the (1+2) is multiplied by the 6/2 so in the end it would be (3+6), which is 9.
Also, BEDMAS > PEMDAS.
I think the whole point of these stupid smurfing questions is that it's arguable which one is "correct".
I've been seeing this for a week and it's pissing me off.
÷ Is Alt and 246 on the numberpad for windows.
PEMDAS works because you must go from right to left. The Distributive Property is just a form of Multiplication, and you always go from left to right. In this example 6/2 is the coefficient. But before applying the distributive property it's best to see if you can combine like terms first, as well as simplify. You are just using a more roundabout way to simplify.It's like going at 2+2 by saying that it's really 2 + bi - (-2 + bi) where b is any real number. Making the problem more complicated than it really needs to be.
You could say it's really 6(0.5 + 1) Note: I distributed the 1/2 and wrote all fractions as decimals.
What it all boils down to is division is really a form of multiplication, just like all subtraction is a form of addition. Also the fact that Arithmetic is very very easy.
Edit:
Parentheses are a type of Brackets. Also Please Excuse My dear Aunt Sally,
9 is the only correct answer. (assuming base 9 or higher of course)
Last edited by qwertysaur; 04-28-2011 at 06:35 PM.
I read something a couple of weeks ago (which I wish I could find again) where a number of people in academia are stating that multiplying a bracket to another number has priority over everything else. Which leads to the ridiculous conclusion that 2(1+2) is different from 2 * (1+2), despite the fact that no one has written like that in the history of ever. The article also conceded that all calculators and computer programs work differently.
It is 9.