FF7 Riddles From Zero

[Sephiroth]

Midgar Zolom = Swamps of the Grassland Region
Chocobo = Grassland Region

Swamps =/= Chocobo footsteps. "The big one" (if it would be a the Midgar Zolom) cannot prevent you from finding a Chocobo because it does not even appear in one area.

"No wonder you might not have found me, there is that other guy that finds you most of the time and prevents you from finding me"

Also, Chocobos are all called "Chocobo". It is impossible to mean that one. The one I think of has a name and a similiar monster of the same species has a different name.

So:

No.

You might never find them: They are optional."

That's not the reason. "The big one" is the reason. Think about "why is the big one the reason"? I have already answered half of this question. And actually I have also answered half of the "remaining half" already. The answer to the first two lines cannot be more obvious now with that much of an explanation.

How to beat, how to catch: Choice of what to do when one shows up."

That is a good guess but the "catching" thing is the only thing that is not necessary to be taken seriously. It only refers to how fast the enemy is, like the two other lines.

Hurry up or I'll be gone: They run away shortly into combat.

Because you're no match: No matter how powerful you get, you can't kill them."

You also need to think about both lines connected. "Because" ... why do you fail to do something? And why do you need to hurry up? Well, the last one, the "I'll be gone" part is answered in the riddle itself already and by you as well.

And the "how to beat" part is really about "defeating them" and that does not work with a Chocobo. "Because you're no match" refers to the monster as a tricky enemy but nothing more. It is just the last line with a bit more meaning than the "catching part" plus gives the "guess part" a meaning about the riddle itself, so you won't just be able to defeat him but you also are not able to find out who I am asking for in this riddle because he is rare and tricky to fight. So focus more on the rest. I told you much about what what means, even everyhing about the last line now.

If I'm not mistaken, the "won't differ" part relates to either the character or the player being unable to distinguish the answer from it's sibling. (That was just an analysis, how accurate should be answered.)

You/The heroes would not be able to notice the difference between the one I am looking for and its similiar looking "siblings", as you call them because their appearance is pretty much the same. For this you need to take this line serious as if Cloud and the others would be living people and stand before something they would not recognize as something different than the monster they can find somewhere else. This is only about physical appearance. The stats are completely different. Same would go for the Chocobos, of course. However, like I said, that is wrong.

Choco, if the answer if chocobo you shouldn't feel ashamed as chocobos are different in each <acronym title="Final Fantasy">FF</acronym> universe if I'm not mistaken (I've played <acronym title="Final Fantasy VII">FF7</acronym>-<acronym title="Final Fantasy IX">FF9</acronym>, no others).

This is a Final Fantasy VII forum. So the difference line only counts for Final Fantasy VII. I am not that inhuman to make a multiverse riddle. And actually Chocobos always are very similiar, but yes, the physical appearance I ask for in the riddle is really about "I look totally equal to my brother in your eyes, Cloud (and the others)". Well, the guy i am looking for is even more similiar, but I'm telling you too much about it and then it could be too easy.

Lucrecia, Gast, Hojo or Shalua would probably know the difference, they are scientists, biologists, genetic scientists, have eidetic memories, et cetera and an eye for details ... but no "normal people", so imagine Cloud and the others meeting the monster I am asking for and then meeting the similiar looking monster. They would never be able to tell you the difference because they look like twins. This, however goes too much into unnecessary explanations which could probably only be more confusing for you. By the way, this is not supposed to be taken to seriously. I just wanted to mention the similiarity. Too much of a detail and the riddle would not work. So I act as if the monster would talk to "biology noobs".

If you have never met that monster you cannot answer this riddle. The "never found me" part is meaningful as you can see. Actually all parts, excluding the "catching part" are but only that part really hinders you from solving that riddle ... that and maybe bad memory ... or missing logical conclusions ... okay, it's three possibilities why you may not solve it, heh.

That is really too much text for this riddle because it takes away the fun with all that serious explanations and reasonings when I tell you about them. I put meaning in every line but if it is too hard for people then I will tell you what I am looking for next time.

I give you a hint: First find out, what "the big one" is. Maybe you were lucky enough that "you mostly did not only find that one" and the other guy instead. Then you may remember the monster I ask for. "The big one" can immediately solve this riddle if you just know these things.

You can also write down everything I have told you to help you. Maybe this makes it easier for you to find out the truth.