I was going to take each member's first post and compare it to their latest post at time of writing, but I stumbled upon a few snags.
First of all was the fact that these are supposed to be representative of the past six months. Can anybody noticeably improve in that short period of time short of, y'know, no longer being Peegee? That's one you can all debate in EoEO.
Secondly,
Baloki is still a furry,
Cuch is still drunk,
Hypo Cactuar is still Hypo and half the forum is unfamiliar with
KaiserDragon, a fact which you should all be ashamed of. Not just like "oh no I'm sorry" ashamed, but "I will forever repent for this gross misdeed, please don't smite me" ashamed. Be warned
So how are we measuring how improved they are? It stands to reason that we should have some sort of
criterion (Note: Criterion is the word you use when you want everyone to know you're too smart to use the word criteria, or something. I actually have no idea of the definition, save me Batman) with which to judge this competition.
My original thought was to get them to fight to the death, but I feel this is an unfair advantage to Cuchulainn who is a natural born brawler. KaiserDragon might also surprise us with his command over an impressive number of dragons. Mmmm,
crispy.
My next idea was to simply graph the number and quality of posts each member has made in the last six months. When I realised that Hypoallergenic Cactuar has made precisely 2130 posts since January 1 this year, I scrapped that idea and decided to move onto the failsafe.
The failsafe is to bulltit for long enough that it looks like I've written a full sized speech and leave all the hard work to Award Guy. Peace off.