Yes, Gilgamesh, I did suspect you of being the Serial Killer because you were the only one who posted strangely and there were two night kills. I didn't change my vote on Day 2 because I didn't see any reason to unsuspect you at the time because you continued to post in your strange fashion despite everyone asking you to explain yourself, which you didn't properly do until today. I did notice that after I mentioned that swords were basically knives and knives were associated with serial killers, you stopped talking about swords. Today, is a new day, you are saying much more in a comprehensible way, and although I still have my eye on you, we now have more evidence to look at as well.

We really need to look at what Barthandalus said and who agreed with him. Both he and Utros were Masons and they both voted for Golbez on Night 1 so I assume that Bart chatted this out with the Mason group, but apparently only Ultros was behind him then. Anyway, the first post of substance that he posted was as follows:

Quote Originally Posted by [M] Barthandelus View Post
I find the baseless bandwagon on Seifer to be a bit odd. I also find it odd that the bandwagon just so happened to pick up speed once Seymour got a couple votes. Purely consequential, but something to think about, at least.

I don't know who to vote for, however. No one seems to to be doing anything scummy. Besides my near nothing on Seymour and how Golbez has only said very little before jumping on a bandwagon, I haven't really seen anything. Actually, from my experience in Mafia, I think Golbez would be a better choice, sooo...

##Vote: Golbez
He is attempting to make people question their voting of Seifer, who at the time had the most votes. If Seifer was a Townie why would he care if there was a bandwagon against him? Just another Townie getting the lynch, right? Why try to change their minds to another Townie? Also, Seifer hasn't posted at all since Day 1 after being very active. This looks very suspicious to me.