So the UW-Stout administration has been asked about this patently ridiculous decision, and a couple of days ago its spokesperson came out with this brilliant retort, which has convinced me that the original poster was too dangerous to allow college students to ever see:
It wouldn't be so sad if that was not the only apparent defense. And then he tried to defend the removal of the second poster:"The word 'kill' is in there," UW-Stout spokesman Doug Mell said. "There's no question about that."
Apparently all action movie posters are SERIOUS THREATS that must be stopped.Mell says that "[t]he second poster was taken down because obviously it depicts violence."
As to why the university continues to refuse to protect an obvious First Amendment right:
Apparently Virginia Tech and Northern Illinois is the college equivalent of "9/11," used to justify any abject stupidity. Anyway, here's a FIRE blog entry with a bunch of links to online reactions to this story, for those interested.Mell explains that "[o]ur action has to be viewed in the context of post-Virginia Tech and post-Northern Illinois."





Reply With Quote